X-twitter Linkedin-in Envelope Globe

Heat Island Reduction, Non-roof: 50%, 75%

By /

Heat Island Reduction, Non-roof: 50%, 75%- The Heat Island Reduction (HIR) strategy for non-roof surfaces aims to mitigate the urban heat island effect by increasing the reflectivity and cooling of outdoor surfaces. Achieving specific reduction levels (e.g., 50% or 75%) typically involves implementing sustainable design practices. Here’s a breakdown:

Key Concepts

  1. Heat Island Effect: Urban areas tend to be hotter than rural ones due to the replacement of natural land cover with materials like asphalt and concrete that retain heat.
  2. Non-roof Surfaces: Includes pavements, sidewalks, parking lots, and other hardscape areas exposed to sunlight.

HIR Goals

  • 50% Reduction: At least 50% of the total site’s non-roof hardscapes must meet heat island reduction criteria.
  • 75% Reduction: At least 75% of the total site’s non-roof hardscapes must meet the criteria, reflecting a more ambitious goal.

Strategies to Achieve HIR Goals

1. High Solar Reflectance (SR) Materials

  • Use paving materials with a Solar Reflectance Index (SRI) of at least 29.
  • Examples:
    • Light-colored concrete.
    • Reflective pavers.
    • Cool pavement coatings.

2. Shading

  • Provide shade for non-roof hardscapes using:
    • Trees (at maturity).
    • Vegetated structures like pergolas or trellises.
    • Solar canopies (photovoltaic panels with dual functionality).
  • Ensure shade coverage calculations consider 5-10 years of tree growth.

3. Open-Grid Pavements

  • Incorporate open-grid systems where at least 50% of the surface is unpaved and vegetated.
  • Examples:
    • Grass pavers.
    • Gravel-filled grids.

4. Permeable Pavements

  • Use permeable materials that reduce heat absorption and manage stormwater.
  • Examples:
    • Permeable concrete or asphalt.
    • Pervious blocks.

5. Alternative Strategies

  • Combine strategies such as partial shading, high-SRI materials, and open-grid pavements to meet reduction targets.

Calculation Example

  1. Calculate the total non-roof hardscape area.
  2. Identify the proportion of this area treated with eligible HIR measures (e.g., shaded, high-SRI materials, open-grid pavements).
  3. Verify the percentage reduction:
    • For 50%: (Treated Area/Total Area)≥50%(text{Treated Area} / text{Total Area}) geq 50%(Treated Area/Total Area)≥50%
    • For 75%: (Treated Area/Total Area)≥75%(text{Treated Area} / text{Total Area}) geq 75%(Treated Area/Total Area)≥75%

Compliance Standards

ASHRAE Standards for solar reflectance and energy efficiency.

LEED v4.1 Sustainable Sites (SS) Credit: Heat Island Reduction.

What is Required Heat Island Reduction, Non-roof: 50%, 75%

The Heat Island Reduction, Non-Roof requirements at 50% and 75% levels focus on implementing measures to reduce the heat absorbed and radiated by non-roof surfaces on a project site. These thresholds are typically associated with sustainability certifications, such as LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), and require specific criteria to be met.

Heat Island Reduction, Non-Roof Requirements

50% Threshold:

  • At least 50% of the total site’s non-roof hardscape area must comply with heat island reduction measures.

75% Threshold:

  • At least 75% of the total site’s non-roof hardscape area must comply with heat island reduction measures.

Eligible Strategies

To meet the 50% or 75% requirement, the following measures can be applied:

1. High Solar Reflectance (SR) Materials

  • Use materials with a Solar Reflectance Index (SRI) ≥ 29 for non-roof hardscape areas.
  • These materials reflect more sunlight and absorb less heat, reducing surface temperatures.

2. Shading

  • Provide shade for hardscape surfaces with:
    • Trees or vegetation at maturity.
    • Structures covered with solar panels or vegetation.
  • Shading must be documented as effective within 10 years of installation.

3. Open-Grid Pavement Systems

  • At least 50% of the surface area of open-grid pavements must be vegetated or permeable.
  • These systems reduce heat absorption and improve water infiltration.

4. Permeable Pavements

  • Use permeable materials like porous asphalt, concrete, or pavers to reduce heat retention and support stormwater management.

5. Combining Strategies

  • Use a combination of the above methods to achieve the required percentage (50% or 75%) for the non-roof area.

Calculation Method

To determine compliance with the 50% or 75% requirement:

  1. Identify Total Non-Roof Hardscape Area:
    • Include all non-roof hardscape areas exposed to the sun (e.g., parking lots, sidewalks, plazas).
  2. Calculate Compliant Area:
    • Sum the areas treated with eligible strategies (e.g., shaded, high-SRI materials, open-grid pavements).
  3. Determine Percentage Compliance:
    • Use the formula: Compliance Percentage=(Treated AreaTotal Non-Roof Hardscape Area)×100text{Compliance Percentage} = left( frac{text{Treated Area}}{text{Total Non-Roof Hardscape Area}} right) times 100Compliance Percentage=(Total Non-Roof Hardscape AreaTreated Area​)×100
    • Ensure this percentage meets or exceeds 50% for the first threshold and 75% for the second.

Example Calculation

  • Total Non-Roof Hardscape Area: 10,000 square feet.
  • Treated Area with High-SRI Materials: 4,000 square feet.
  • Shaded Area by Trees or Solar Panels: 2,000 square feet.
  • Open-Grid Pavement Area: 1,000 square feet.

Total Treated Area:

4,000+2,000+1,000=7,000 square feet4,000 + 2,000 + 1,000 = 7,000 text{ square feet}4,000+2,000+1,000=7,000 square feet

Compliance Percentage:

7,00010,000×100=70%frac{7,000}{10,000} times 100 = 70%10,0007,000​×100=70%

  • This project meets the 50% threshold but does not achieve 75% compliance.

Documentation Requirements

  1. Site Plan: Annotate areas treated with each strategy.
  2. SRI or SR Values: Provide product data sheets for reflective materials.
  3. Shade Projections: Include shading calculations and tree growth projections.
  4. Photographs or Design Details: For open-grid systems and permeable pavements.

Who is Required Heat Island Reduction, Non-roof: 50%, 75%

Courtesy: Projectific Inc.

The Heat Island Reduction, Non-Roof: 50% and 75% requirements are typically directed at projects aiming to meet sustainability standards or certifications, such as LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design). The requirements apply to entities involved in designing, constructing, or managing outdoor spaces for various types of projects. Here’s who is generally required to meet these standards:

Who Must Comply

  1. Projects Pursuing Sustainability Certifications:
    • LEED Projects: These requirements are part of the LEED Sustainable Sites (SS) credit for Heat Island Reduction.
    • Other certifications with similar goals, such as Green Globes, Living Building Challenge, or WELL Building Standard.
  2. Building Owners and Developers:
    • Those constructing new buildings or retrofitting existing ones, especially for commercial, institutional, or large residential projects.
  3. Architects, Urban Planners, and Landscape Designers:
    • Professionals responsible for designing hardscape and landscape areas must ensure compliance with heat island mitigation strategies.
  4. Municipalities and Public Agencies:
    • Local governments implementing sustainable development guidelines for urban areas, parks, or public spaces.
    • Public infrastructure projects like streets, plazas, or parking lots often have heat island reduction goals.
  5. Corporate Campuses and Institutional Projects:
    • Corporate offices, universities, and healthcare facilities integrating sustainability goals in their master planning.
  6. Residential and Mixed-Use Developments:
    • Large-scale residential or mixed-use projects striving for sustainability certifications or compliance with local green building codes.

Why These Entities Are Required to Comply

  1. Sustainability Goals: To reduce the urban heat island effect, improve thermal comfort, and mitigate climate impacts.
  2. Certification Requirements: Achieving the Heat Island Reduction credit is often necessary to earn points for certifications like LEED.
  3. Regulatory Compliance: Some cities or regions mandate heat island reduction strategies through zoning codes or green infrastructure policies.
  4. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Companies and institutions seeking to reduce environmental impacts may voluntarily adopt these measures.

Specific Scenarios

  • LEED Certification: A project team pursuing LEED must demonstrate that at least 50% or 75% of the non-roof hardscape area meets the heat island reduction criteria.
  • Local Regulations: Some municipalities have heat island ordinances requiring developers to use high-reflectance materials or shaded surfaces.
  • Institutional Initiatives: Universities or hospitals implementing green campus initiatives may aim for these thresholds.

When is Required Heat Island Reduction, Non-roof: 50%, 75%

The Heat Island Reduction, Non-Roof: 50% and 75% thresholds are required during specific phases of a project, depending on the goals, certifications, or local regulations. Here’s an overview of when these thresholds might be required:

When Heat Island Reduction is Required

1. During Certification Processes

  • LEED Certification:
    • If a project is pursuing LEED credits for Heat Island Reduction, the 50% or 75% threshold applies during the design and construction phases.
    • These credits must be documented and submitted for review as part of the certification application.
  • Other Green Certifications:
    • Certifications like Green Globes, Living Building Challenge, or WELL may also have similar requirements that must be addressed before or during project completion.

2. When Required by Local Regulations

  • Some municipalities or regions mandate heat island reduction strategies as part of:
    • Zoning laws or building codes.
    • Environmental impact assessments for new developments.
  • Compliance is typically required before receiving a construction or occupancy permit.

3. For Public or Institutional Projects

  • Public agencies or institutions (e.g., universities, hospitals) often include heat island reduction goals in:
    • Master planning documents.
    • Project specifications for new developments or renovations.
    • These requirements are addressed during design and verified during construction inspections.

4. As Part of Corporate Sustainability Goals

  • Companies pursuing net-zero carbon, green infrastructure, or sustainability reporting goals often adopt these measures voluntarily.
  • Implementation occurs during the site planning and design phase and is tracked through post-construction performance monitoring.

Project Phases with Heat Island Reduction Requirements

Phase Activity HIR Compliance Checkpoints
Site Planning Establish heat island reduction goals, choose materials, and incorporate shading strategies. Initial calculations for meeting 50% or 75% thresholds.
Design Development Specify high-SRI materials, shading elements, and open-grid or permeable paving systems. Submit designs for certification or regulatory review.
Construction Implement heat island reduction measures as per design. Conduct on-site verification of materials and strategies.
Post-Construction Verify compliance (e.g., shading projections, material SRI values). Submit documentation for certification or regulatory approval.

Examples of When Specific Thresholds Apply

  1. LEED Certification (SS Credit: Heat Island Reduction):
    • 50% Reduction: Often targeted by standard commercial projects.
    • 75% Reduction: Pursued by projects aiming for higher LEED point levels or exemplary performance.
    • Required during design submission and finalized during construction documentation.
  2. Municipal Heat Island Ordinances:
    • Compliance is verified before granting building permits or occupancy certificates.
  3. Renovations or Redevelopment Projects:
    • Heat island reduction strategies may be required during the redevelopment of urban sites, particularly in high-density or heat-vulnerable areas.

Where is Required Heat Island Reduction, Non-roof: 50%, 75%

The Heat Island Reduction, Non-Roof: 50% and 75% requirements are applied in various contexts and locations, typically guided by sustainability certifications, local regulations, and project-specific goals. Here’s a breakdown of where these requirements may be enforced or implemented:

1. LEED-Certified Projects

  • Global Scope: LEED certification is used worldwide in both urban and rural areas.
  • Applicable to projects pursuing LEED Sustainable Sites (SS) Credit: Heat Island Reduction in sectors such as:
    • Commercial buildings.
    • Mixed-use developments.
    • Institutional campuses (universities, hospitals).
    • Large-scale residential developments.

2. Regions with Urban Heat Island Policies

  • Cities and Municipalities: Some cities have specific codes or incentives to reduce heat islands, particularly in areas prone to extreme heat. These requirements often overlap with zoning and planning regulations.
    • Examples:
      • Los Angeles, CA: Requires cool pavements and reflective surfaces for public projects.
      • Phoenix, AZ: Implements measures as part of heat mitigation strategies in urban areas.
      • New York City, NY: Promotes reflective coatings and permeable pavements in urban development.
  • States/Provinces: Some states have broader regulations, such as:
    • California: CalGreen Building Standards Code includes heat island reduction measures.
    • Ontario, Canada: Green development standards encourage heat island mitigation.

3. Dense Urban Areas

  • Requirements are most relevant in urban heat island hotspots, where impervious surfaces dominate, and ambient temperatures are significantly higher than surrounding rural areas.
  • Common settings:
    • Central business districts.
    • Parking lots, plazas, and sidewalks.
    • Large open areas in urban developments.

4. Public Infrastructure and Civic Spaces

  • Often mandated in projects involving streetscapes, parks, or public plazas.
  • Examples:
    • Designing reflective sidewalks or shaded walkways for public use.
    • Implementing permeable pavements in public parking lots.

5. Sustainability-Oriented Campuses

  • Universities, hospitals, and corporate campuses integrate these requirements in master plans for sustainable development.
  • Locations:
    • College campuses striving for LEED or net-zero goals.
    • Healthcare facilities seeking WELL certification or reducing heat for patient comfort.

6. Green Building Markets

  • Requirements are most common in regions with strong green building markets, such as:
    • United States: LEED-certified projects are widespread.
    • European Union: Green building initiatives often incorporate heat island reduction as part of environmental goals.
    • Asia-Pacific Region: Countries like Japan, Singapore, and Australia are adopting heat mitigation strategies in urban areas.

Where 50% vs. 75% Thresholds Apply

  • 50% Threshold:
    • Commonly applied in moderate-impact projects where budget or site constraints limit the extent of heat island reduction strategies.
    • Examples:
      • Mixed-use or residential developments with limited non-roof hardscape.
      • Urban retrofit projects with partial shading or reflective surfaces.
  • 75% Threshold:
    • More often seen in high-impact projects, where achieving exemplary performance is a priority.
    • Examples:
      • Corporate campuses or institutional projects with strong sustainability goals.
      • LEED Platinum projects seeking additional credits or recognition.

How is Required Heat Island Reduction, Non-roof: 50%, 75%

Courtesy: Nelca Roco, LEED v4 On-line Review

The Heat Island Reduction, Non-Roof: 50% and 75% thresholds are achieved through a combination of sustainable design strategies that address the solar reflectivity, shading, and permeability of non-roof surfaces. Here’s a detailed breakdown of how these requirements are met:

Steps to Achieve Heat Island Reduction

1. Calculate Total Non-Roof Hardscape Area

  • Identify all non-roof surfaces on the project site, such as:
    • Parking lots
    • Driveways
    • Walkways
    • Plazas
    • Any other hardscapes exposed to the sun
  • Exclude surfaces under permanent structures or roofs.

2. Determine the Required Treated Area

  • For 50% Reduction:
    At least 50% of the total non-roof hardscape area must incorporate heat island reduction measures.
  • For 75% Reduction:
    At least 75% of the total non-roof hardscape area must incorporate these measures.

3. Apply Eligible Strategies

Use one or a combination of the following strategies to meet the percentage thresholds:

Eligible Strategies to Meet Requirements

a. Use High Solar Reflectance Materials

  • Use materials with a Solar Reflectance Index (SRI) of at least 29.
  • Examples:
    • Light-colored concrete or asphalt.
    • Reflective coatings on pavement.
    • High-albedo paving materials.

b. Provide Shading

  • Provide shading for hardscape areas using:
    • Vegetation: Mature tree canopies or shrubs.
    • Structures: Pergolas, trellises, or green walls.
    • Solar Panels: Dual-use shading with photovoltaic systems.
  • Ensure shading projections account for the 10-year maturity of vegetation.

c. Use Open-Grid Pavements

  • Install open-grid paving systems where at least 50% of the surface area is unpaved and vegetated.
  • Examples:
    • Grass pavers.
    • Gravel-filled grids.
  • These systems allow heat dissipation and improve permeability.

d. Use Permeable Pavements

  • Install permeable or porous paving systems that reduce heat absorption.
  • Examples:
    • Porous asphalt.
    • Pervious concrete.
    • Interlocking pavers with gaps for vegetation or gravel.

e. Combine Strategies

  • Combine the above strategies to achieve the required percentage of treated areas. For instance:
    • Use reflective materials on 40% of the area.
    • Provide tree shade on 20%.
    • Install open-grid pavements on 15%.

4. Verify Compliance

  • Use the formula: Compliance Percentage=(Treated AreaTotal Non-Roof Hardscape Area)×100text{Compliance Percentage} = left( frac{text{Treated Area}}{text{Total Non-Roof Hardscape Area}} right) times 100Compliance Percentage=(Total Non-Roof Hardscape AreaTreated Area​)×100
  • Confirm that the treated area meets or exceeds 50% or 75%, depending on the project’s goal.

5. Documentation for Certification

  • Provide evidence of compliance for certifications like LEED:
    • Material SRI Values: Submit manufacturer data sheets or test results.
    • Shading Calculations: Include plans showing tree canopies or shading structures and their 10-year projections.
    • Open-Grid or Permeable Systems: Provide design details and installation specifications.

Example

  1. Project Scenario:
    • Total Non-Roof Hardscape Area: 10,000 square feet.
    • Strategies Applied:
      • High-SRI materials: 4,000 square feet.
      • Tree shading: 2,500 square feet.
      • Open-grid paving: 1,000 square feet.
  2. Treated Area Calculation:
    • Total Treated Area = 4,000 + 2,500 + 1,000 = 7,500 square feet.
    • Compliance Percentage = 7,50010,000×100=75%frac{7,500}{10,000} times 100 = 75%10,0007,500​×100=75%.
  3. Outcome:
    • The project meets the 75% threshold.

Tools to Help with Compliance

  • SRI Calculators: Tools to calculate Solar Reflectance Index for paving materials.
  • Shade Analysis Software: Tools like ArcGIS or iTree to estimate shading areas over time.
  • Green Infrastructure Guides: Manuals for open-grid or permeable paving installation.

Case Study on Heat Island Reduction, Non-roof: 50%, 75%

Achieving 75% Compliance

Project Name: Green Urban Plaza

Location: Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Project Type: Mixed-Use Development (Commercial and Residential)

Certification Goal: LEED Gold Certification

Overview

The Green Urban Plaza project aimed to achieve the Heat Island Reduction, Non-Roof: 75% threshold as part of its sustainability goals. Located in a dense urban area with extreme heat challenges, the project team implemented innovative strategies to minimize heat absorption and improve outdoor thermal comfort.

Project Details

  • Total Non-Roof Hardscape Area: 20,000 square feet
  • Target Treated Area for 75% Compliance: 15,000 square feet

Strategies Implemented

1. High Solar Reflectance Materials

  • Area Treated: 8,000 square feet
  • Details:
    • Used light-colored concrete with an SRI of 35 for pedestrian walkways and plaza surfaces.
    • Added reflective coatings to existing asphalt parking areas.
  • Benefits:
    • Reduced surface temperatures by 20°F compared to traditional dark materials.

2. Shading with Vegetation and Structures

  • Area Treated: 5,000 square feet
  • Details:
    • Planted 25 drought-resistant trees along walkways and seating areas.
    • Designed a trellis system with solar panels that provided both shade and renewable energy.
    • Estimated 60% shading coverage at tree maturity (10 years).
  • Benefits:
    • Reduced heat absorption.
    • Enhanced thermal comfort for pedestrians.

3. Open-Grid Pavement Systems

  • Area Treated: 2,500 square feet
  • Details:
    • Installed permeable pavers with 50% vegetated gaps in parking areas and outdoor recreational zones.
  • Benefits:
    • Reduced surface temperatures.
    • Improved stormwater management and reduced runoff.

Results

  1. Treated Area Total:
    • High-SRI Materials: 8,000 sq. ft.
    • Shading: 5,000 sq. ft.
    • Open-Grid Pavements: 2,500 sq. ft.
    • Total Treated Area: 15,500 sq. ft.
  2. Compliance Percentage:frac{15,500}{20,000} times 100 = 77.5% ]
    • Result: Exceeded the 75% threshold required for LEED Heat Island Reduction credit.

Key Challenges

  • Urban Space Constraints:
    • Limited room for additional vegetation. Solution: Dual-use shading with solar panels.
  • Budget Concerns:
    • Higher initial costs for high-SRI materials. Solution: Justified by lifecycle cost savings through lower cooling demands.

Key Outcomes

  1. Environmental Impact:
    • Reduced urban heat island effect by 30% within the project site.
    • Improved air quality and thermal comfort for residents and visitors.
  2. Certification:
    • Successfully achieved LEED Gold certification, with exemplary performance points for Heat Island Reduction.
  3. Economic Benefits:
    • Increased property value due to sustainable design.
    • Lower long-term maintenance costs from durable materials and permeable pavements.
  4. Social Benefits:
    • Enhanced pedestrian experience with cooler surfaces and shaded seating areas.
    • Promoted outdoor activities in a climate-challenged area.

Lessons Learned

  1. Integrated Design Approach:
    • Collaboration between architects, landscape designers, and sustainability consultants was critical to meeting the goals.
  2. Long-Term Planning:
    • Factoring in tree maturity and shading potential ensured compliance over time.
  3. Flexible Strategies:
    • A combination of materials, shading, and permeable systems provided adaptability for future urban projects.

White paper on Heat Island Reduction, Non-roof: 50%, 75%

Executive Summary

Urban heat islands (UHIs) significantly increase temperatures in cities due to the absorption and retention of heat by impervious surfaces such as roads, parking lots, and sidewalks. These temperature increases lead to higher energy consumption, greater greenhouse gas emissions, and adverse effects on public health. Implementing strategies for heat island reduction, particularly for non-roof surfaces, can mitigate these impacts. Achieving reductions of 50% and 75% in non-roof heat absorption is a key goal in sustainability initiatives, including green building certifications like LEED.

This white paper outlines methods, benefits, challenges, and case studies related to achieving heat island reduction for non-roof surfaces.

Introduction

What is the Heat Island Effect?

The urban heat island effect is a phenomenon where urban areas experience higher temperatures than surrounding rural areas due to the extensive use of heat-absorbing materials and a lack of vegetation. Non-roof surfaces, such as parking lots and pavements, are major contributors to this effect.

Importance of Non-Roof Heat Island Reduction

Non-roof surfaces make up a significant portion of urban landscapes. Addressing their contribution to UHIs by adopting reflective materials, increasing vegetation, and using permeable systems can:

  • Reduce local temperatures.
  • Decrease energy demand for cooling.
  • Improve public health and comfort.
  • Support stormwater management.

Key Performance Thresholds

50% Non-Roof Heat Island Reduction

Projects achieving this threshold must treat at least 50% of the total non-roof hardscape area with heat island reduction strategies.

75% Non-Roof Heat Island Reduction

This higher threshold demonstrates exemplary performance, requiring treatment of at least 75% of the total non-roof hardscape area.

Strategies for Heat Island Reduction

1. Use of High Solar Reflectance Index (SRI) Materials

  • Definition: Materials with an SRI of at least 29 reflect more sunlight and absorb less heat.
  • Applications:
    • Light-colored concrete.
    • Reflective coatings for asphalt and pavements.
  • Benefits:
    • Surface temperature reduction.
    • Increased material durability.

2. Vegetative Shading

  • Definition: Shading from trees, shrubs, or vegetative structures.
  • Applications:
    • Tree-lined streets.
    • Green pergolas and trellises.
  • Key Considerations:
    • Shading must account for 10-year tree canopy maturity projections.
    • Use of drought-resistant species in arid regions.

3. Open-Grid and Permeable Pavements

  • Definition: Pavements that allow air and water to pass through, reducing heat retention.
  • Applications:
    • Grass pavers.
    • Porous concrete and asphalt.
  • Benefits:
    • Reduced surface heat absorption.
    • Improved stormwater management.

4. Integrated Shading and Renewable Energy Systems

  • Definition: Use of structures that provide shading and generate solar power.
  • Applications:
    • Solar-panel canopies over parking lots.
  • Benefits:
    • Dual functionality for energy generation and heat reduction.

Case Studies

1. Green Urban Plaza, Phoenix, Arizona

  • Project Scope: Mixed-use development with a focus on sustainability.
  • Strategies:
    • High-SRI concrete for walkways (8,000 sq. ft.).
    • Tree shading (5,000 sq. ft.).
    • Open-grid pavements (2,500 sq. ft.).
  • Outcome: Achieved 77.5% treated area, exceeding the 75% threshold.

2. Municipal Parking Lot, Los Angeles, California

  • Project Scope: Redesign of a 15,000 sq. ft. public parking lot.
  • Strategies:
    • Reflective asphalt coatings.
    • Solar-panel shading structures.
    • Permeable pavers.
  • Outcome: Treated 11,500 sq. ft., meeting the 75% threshold.

Benefits of Achieving Heat Island Reduction Targets

1. Environmental Benefits

  • Reduction in localized air temperatures by 2-3°F.
  • Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Enhanced biodiversity through vegetation.

2. Economic Benefits

  • Lower cooling costs for nearby buildings.
  • Increased property values in cooler, shaded areas.
  • Reduced maintenance costs due to durable materials.

3. Social Benefits

  • Improved outdoor thermal comfort.
  • Reduced risk of heat-related illnesses.
  • Enhanced aesthetics and community appeal.

Challenges and Solutions

Challenges

  1. Cost of High-SRI Materials: Reflective materials and coatings can be more expensive than traditional alternatives.
  2. Space Constraints: Urban areas often lack space for vegetation or permeable systems.
  3. Maintenance: Vegetation and permeable pavements require regular upkeep.

Solutions

  1. Lifecycle Cost Analysis: Highlight long-term savings from reduced energy consumption and maintenance.
  2. Multifunctional Design: Use dual-purpose elements, such as solar-panel canopies, to maximize benefits.
  3. Policy Incentives: Encourage municipalities to offer grants or tax benefits for heat island reduction projects.

Recommendations

  1. Integrate Heat Island Reduction in Planning: Prioritize these strategies during site planning and design phases.
  2. Adopt Holistic Approaches: Combine reflective materials, shading, and permeable systems for maximum impact.
  3. Promote Awareness: Educate stakeholders on the benefits and methods of heat island reduction.

Conclusion

Heat island reduction for non-roof surfaces is a critical strategy for creating sustainable, resilient urban environments. By implementing high-SRI materials, vegetative shading, and permeable pavements, projects can achieve 50% and 75% compliance thresholds, contributing to environmental, economic, and social benefits. Stakeholders must embrace innovative approaches and collaborate to overcome challenges, ensuring widespread adoption of these practices.

References

  1. U.S. Green Building Council. “LEED Credit Library: Heat Island Reduction.”
  2. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). “Reducing Urban Heat Islands: Compendium of Strategies.”
  3. International Energy Agency (IEA). “Urban Cooling Strategies in High-Temperature Regions.”

Industrial Application of Heat Island Reduction, Non-roof: 50%, 75%

Courtesy: CEE 424 Spring 2019

The industrial application of heat island reduction measures (non-roof-based strategies) at 50% and 75% coverage refers to techniques aimed at mitigating the Urban Heat Island (UHI) effect. UHI occurs when urban and industrial areas retain heat due to large amounts of impervious surfaces, such as concrete and asphalt, which absorb and retain heat during the day. Below are the strategies and applications for 50% and 75% non-roof coverage in industrial contexts:

1. Industrial Applications for Heat Island Reduction (Non-Roof)

These typically focus on managing paved areas, parking lots, and surrounding landscapes:

A. Strategies for Non-Roof Surfaces

  1. High-Albedo Materials
    • Use materials with high solar reflectance (SRI) for pavements, walkways, and loading docks.
    • Concrete with reflective coatings or light-colored asphalt can reduce surface temperatures.
    • Application at 50% or 75% coverage significantly reduces heat absorption.
  2. Permeable Pavements
    • Replace traditional concrete or asphalt with permeable pavements (e.g., porous concrete, interlocking pavers).
    • These allow water infiltration and reduce heat retention while aiding in stormwater management.
  3. Shading with Vegetation
    • Plant trees or install vegetative screens along industrial site perimeters, parking areas, and pathways.
    • At 50% or 75% coverage, shade reduces solar exposure, lowering surface temperatures.
  4. Cool Pavement Technologies
    • Apply cool pavement coatings or overlays on existing industrial roads, parking lots, and outdoor storage areas.
    • These coatings reflect more sunlight and reduce heat absorption.
  5. Water Features
    • Introduce water elements, such as small retention ponds or fountains, to cool surrounding areas through evaporative cooling.

2. Industrial Benefits of 50% and 75% Coverage

  1. 50% Coverage:
    • Moderate reduction in heat retention in industrial areas.
    • Suitable for sites with partial capacity for implementation or budgetary constraints.
    • Improves worker comfort in outdoor areas (e.g., loading docks, parking).
  2. 75% Coverage:
    • Greater reduction in heat buildup, particularly in areas with large impervious surfaces.
    • More significant energy savings due to reduced reliance on cooling systems.
    • Contributes substantially to local UHI mitigation and compliance with green certifications (e.g., LEED, WELL).

3. Examples of Industrial Applications

  • Logistics Parks: Use permeable or cool pavements in parking lots and access roads.
  • Manufacturing Facilities: Install reflective surfaces in outdoor storage areas and loading docks.
  • Warehouses: Incorporate vegetation and shaded structures for exterior areas to reduce heat.

References

  1. ^ Phelan, Patrick E.; Kaloush, Kamil; Miner, Mark; Golden, Jay; Phelan, Bernadette; Silva, Humberto; Taylor, Robert A. (4 November 2015). “Urban Heat Island: Mechanisms, Implications, and Possible Remedies”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 40 (1): 285–307. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021155. S2CID 154497357.
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b Solecki, William D.; Rosenzweig, Cynthia; Parshall, Lily; Pope, Greg; Clark, Maria; Cox, Jennifer; Wiencke, Mary (2005). “Mitigation of the heat island effect in urban New Jersey”. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards. 6 (1): 39–49. doi:10.1016/j.hazards.2004.12.002. S2CID 153841143.
  3. ^ United States Environmental Protection Agency (2008). Reducing urban heat islands: Compendium of strategies (Report). pp. 7–12.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b Li, Y.; Zhao, X. (2012). “An empirical study of the impact of human activity on long-term temperature change in China: A perspective from energy consumption”. Journal of Geophysical Research. 117 (D17): D17117. Bibcode:2012JGRD..11717117L. doi:10.1029/2012JD018132.
  5. ^ Wang, K. (February 6, 2017). “Comparing the diurnal and seasonal variabilities of atmospheric, and surface urban heat islands based on the Beijing Urban Meteorological Network”. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 122 (4): 2131–2154. Bibcode:2017JGRD..122.2131W. doi:10.1002/2016JD025304.
  6. ^ Glossary of Meteorology (2019). “Urban Heat Island”. American Meteorological Society. Retrieved 2019-04-12.
  7. ^ Chakraborty, T. and Lee, X. (2019). “A simplified urban-extent algorithm to characterize surface urban heat islands on a global scale and examine vegetation control on their spatiotemporal variability”. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 74: 269–280. Bibcode:2019IJAEO..74..269C. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2018.09.015. S2CID 53715577.
  8. ^ Waldrop, M. Mitchell (19 October 2022). “What can cities do to survive extreme heat?”. Knowable Magazine. doi:10.1146/knowable-101922-2. Retrieved 6 December 2022.
  9. ^ “Nature of Cities”. Regeneration.org. Retrieved 2021-10-16.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b Younes, Jaafar; Ghali, Kamel; Ghaddar, Nesreen (August 2022). “Diurnal Selective Radiative Cooling Impact in Mitigating Urban Heat Island Effect”. Sustainable Cities and Society. 83: 103932. Bibcode:2022SusCS..8303932Y. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2022.103932. S2CID 248588547.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b Khan, Ansar; Carlosena, Laura; Feng, Jie; Khorat, Samiran; Khatun, Rupali; Doan, Quang-Van; Santamouris, Mattheos (19 January 2022). “Optically Modulated Passive Broadband Daytime Radiative Cooling Materials Can Cool Cities in Summer and Heat Cities in Winter”. Sustainability. 14 (3): 1110. doi:10.3390/su14031110. hdl:2454/46738.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Cities, Settlements and Key Infrastructure”. Climate Change 2022 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. 2023. pp. 907–1040. doi:10.1017/9781009325844.008. ISBN 978-1-009-32584-4.
  13. ^ Sharifi, Ayyoob (2020). “Trade-offs and conflicts between urban climate change mitigation and adaptation measures: A literature review”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 276: 122813. Bibcode:2020JCPro.27622813S. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122813. S2CID 225638176.
  14. ^ Jump up to:a b “Glossary”. Climate Change 2022 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. 2023. pp. 2897–2930. doi:10.1017/9781009325844.029. ISBN 978-1-009-32584-4.
  15. ^ “Urban Heat Islands | Center for Science Education”. scied.ucar.edu. Retrieved 2024-07-02.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b US Envrionmental Protection Agency, OAR (2014-06-17). “Learn About Heat Islands”. www.epa.gov. Retrieved 2024-07-01.
  17. ^ Zhou, Decheng; Zhang, Liangxia; Hao, Lu; Sun, Ge; Liu, Yongqiang; Zhu, Chao (2016). “Spatiotemporal trends of urban heat island effect along the urban development intensity gradient in China”. Science of the Total Environment. 544: 617–626. Bibcode:2016ScTEn.544..617Z. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.168. ISSN 0048-9697. PMID 26674691.
  18. ^ Liou, Yuei-An; Tran, Duy-Phien; Nguyen, Kim-Anh (2022-02-22). “Diurnal and Seasonal Characteristics of Surface Urban Heat Island in Taiwan”. (CETA 2021) 2021 International Conference on Computer Engineering, Technologies and Applications. ISSN 2516-2314.
  19. ^ Amorim, Margarete Cristiane de Costa Trindade; Dubreuil, Vincent; Amorim, Amanda Trindade (2021). “Day and night surface and atmospheric heat islands in a continental and temperate tropical environment”. Urban Climate. 38: 100918. Bibcode:2021UrbCl..3800918A. doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100918. ISSN 2212-0955.
  20. ^ Shastri, Hiteshri; Barik, Beas; Ghosh, Subimal; Venkataraman, Chandra; Sadavarte, Pankaj (2017-01-09). “Flip flop of Day-night and Summer-Winter Surface Urban Heat Island Intensity in India”. Scientific Reports. 7 (1): 40178. Bibcode:2017NatSR…740178S. doi:10.1038/srep40178. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 5220321. PMID 28067276.
  21. ^ Mohajerani, Abbas; Bakaric, Jason; Jeffrey-Bailey, Tristan (2017-07-15). “The urban heat island effect, its causes, and mitigation, with reference to the thermal properties of asphalt concrete”. Journal of Environmental Management. 197: 522–538. Bibcode:2017JEnvM.197..522M. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.095. ISSN 0301-4797. PMID 28412623.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Manoli, Gabriele; Fatichi, Simone; Bou-Zeid, Elie; Katul, Gabriel G. (2020-03-31). “Seasonal hysteresis of surface urban heat islands”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117 (13): 7082–7089. Bibcode:2020PNAS..117.7082M. doi:10.1073/pnas.1917554117. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 7132285. PMID 32184330.
  23. ^ Imhoff, Marc L.; Zhang, Ping; Wolfe, Robert E.; Bounoua, Lahouari (2010-03-15). “Remote sensing of the urban heat island effect across biomes in the continental USA”. Remote Sensing of Environment. 114 (3): 504–513. Bibcode:2010RSEnv.114..504I. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2009.10.008. hdl:2060/20110015410. ISSN 0034-4257.
  24. ^ Cui, Yu Yan; Foy, Benjamin de (2012-05-01). “Seasonal Variations of the Urban Heat Island at the Surface and the Near-Surface and Reductions due to Urban Vegetation in Mexico City”. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. 51 (5): 855–868. Bibcode:2012JApMC..51..855C. doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-11-0104.1. ISSN 1558-8424.
  25. ^ Han, Liying; Lu, Linlin; Fu, Peng; Ren, Chao; Cai, Meng; Li, Qingting (2023). “Exploring the seasonality of surface urban heat islands using enhanced land surface temperature in a semi-arid city”. Urban Climate. 49: 101455. Bibcode:2023UrbCl..4901455H. doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101455.
  26. ^ “Executive Summary: Creating and Mapping an Urban Heat Island Index for California” (PDF). CalEPA | California Environmental Protection Agency. October 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2019-07-31. Retrieved 2024-07-24.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b “Understanding the Urban Heat Island Index | CalEPA”. CalEPA | California Environmental Protection Agency. Archived from the original on 2017-12-19. Retrieved 2024-07-24.
  28. ^ Jump up to:a b “Creating and Mapping an Urban Heat Island Index for California” (PDF). CalEPA | California Environmental Protection Agency. October 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2019-07-31. Retrieved 2024-07-24.
  29. ^ Steeneveld, G. J. (2011). “Quantifying urban heat island effects and human comfort for cities of variable size and urban morphology in the Netherlands”. Journal of Geophysical Research. 116 (D20): D20129. Bibcode:2011JGRD..11620129S. doi:10.1029/2011JD015988.
  30. ^ Kershaw, T. J.; Sanderson, M.; Coley, D.; Eames, M. (2010). “Estimation of the urban heat island for UK climate change projections”. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology. 31 (3): 251–263. doi:10.1177/0143624410365033. hdl:10871/13934.
  31. ^ Theeuwes, N. E.; Steeneveld, G. J.; Ronda, R. J.; Holtslag, A. A. M. (2017). “A diagnostic equation for the daily maximum urban heat island effect for cities in northwestern Europe”. International Journal of Climatology. 37 (1): 443–454. Bibcode:2017IJCli..37..443T. doi:10.1002/joc.4717. S2CID 131437962.
  32. ^ Jump up to:a b c Myrup, Leonard O. (1969). “A Numerical Model of the Urban Heat Island”. Journal of Applied Meteorology. 8 (6): 908–918. Bibcode:1969JApMe…8..908M. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1969)008<0908:ANMOTU>2.0.CO;2.
  33. ^ n.n. “ENVI-met-Alternativen für Mac — Altapps.net”. de.altapps.net (in German). Retrieved 2022-06-01.
  34. ^ Jump up to:a b Oke, T. R. (1982). “The energetic basis of the urban heat island”. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 108 (455): 1–24. Bibcode:1982QJRMS.108….1O. doi:10.1002/qj.49710845502. S2CID 120122894.
  35. ^ Jump up to:a b Hoehne, Christopher G.; Chester, Mikhail V.; Sailor, David J.; King, David A. (4 July 2022). “Urban Heat Implications from Parking, Roads, and Cars: a Case Study of Metro Phoenix”. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure. 7 (4): 272–290. Bibcode:2022SusRI…7..272H. doi:10.1080/23789689.2020.1773013. S2CID 225553384.
  36. ^ Kumar, Rahul; Mishra, Vimal; Buzan, Jonathan; Kumar, Rohini; Shindell, Drew; Huber, Matthew (25 October 2017). “Dominant control of agriculture and irrigation on urban heat island in India”. Scientific Reports. 7 (1): 14054. Bibcode:2017NatSR…714054K. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14213-2. PMC 5656645. PMID 29070866.
  37. ^ Larsson, Naomi (10 May 2018). “US cities losing 36 million trees a year, researchers find”. The Guardian. Retrieved 10 May 2018.
  38. ^ Santos, Fabiane (23 August 2013). “Trees – the Natural Air Conditioners”. Scientific Scribbles. University of Melbourne. Archived from the original on 2022-04-07.
  39. ^ Gorsevski, V.; Luvall, J.; Quattrochi, D.; Taha, H. (1998). “Air Pollution Prevention Through Urban Heat Island Mitigation: An Update on the Urban Heat Island Pilot Project” (PDF). Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL). CiteSeerX 10.1.1.111.4921. LBNL-42736.
  40. ^ Sailor, D. J. (2011). “A review of methods for estimating anthropogenic heat and moisture emissions in the urban environment”. International Journal of Climatology. 31 (2): 189–199. Bibcode:2011IJCli..31..189S. doi:10.1002/joc.2106. S2CID 54835415.
  41. ^ Chen, F.; Kusaka, H.; Bornstein, R.; Ching, J.; Grimmond, C. S. B.; Grossman-Clarke, S.; Loridan, T.; Manning, K. W.; Martilli, A.; Miao, S.; Sailor, D.; Salamanca, F. P.; Taha, H.; Tewari, M.; Wang, X.; Wyszogrodzki, A. A.; Zhang, C. (2011). “The integrated WRF/urban modelling system: Development, evaluation, and applications to urban environmental problems”. International Journal of Climatology. 31 (2): 273. Bibcode:2011IJCli..31..273C. doi:10.1002/joc.2158. S2CID 54686199.
  42. ^ Mansourmoghaddam, Mohammad; Alavipanah, Seyed Kazem (2022). “Study and prediction of land surface temperature changes of Yazd city: assessing the proximity and changes of land cover”. RS and GIS for Natural Resources. 12 (4): 1–27.
  43. ^ Union of Concerned Scientists. “Rising Temperatures, Worsening Ozone Pollution.” Climate Change and Your Health (2011): n. pag. Print.
  44. ^ “Technical Summary”. Climate Change 2022 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. 2023. pp. 37–118. doi:10.1017/9781009325844.002. ISBN 978-1-009-32584-4.
  45. ^ Arizona Board of Regents (2006). “Urban Climate – Climate Study and UHI”. Arizona State University. Archived from the original on 2007-11-23. Retrieved 2007-08-02.
  46. ^ van Heerwaarden, Chiel C. & Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J. (2008). “Relative humidity as an indicator for cloud formation over heterogeneous land surfaces”. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 65 (10): 3263–3277. Bibcode:2008JAtS…65.3263V. doi:10.1175/2008JAS2591.1. S2CID 56010396.
  47. ^ Fuchs, Dale (2005-06-28). “Spain goes hi-tech to beat drought”. The Guardian. Retrieved 2007-08-02.
  48. ^ Goddard Space Flight Center (2002-06-18). “NASA Satellite Confirms Urban Heat Islands Increase Rainfall Around Cities”. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Archived from the original on June 12, 2008. Retrieved 2009-07-17.
  49. ^ Zhou, Decheng; Zhao, Shuqing; Zhang, Liangxia; Sun, Ge; Liu, Yongqiang (10 June 2015). “The footprint of urban heat island effect in China”. Scientific Reports. 5: 11160. Bibcode:2015NatSR…511160Z. doi:10.1038/srep11160. PMC 4461918. PMID 26060039.
  50. ^ Peterson, T. C.; Gallo, K. P.; Lawrimore, J.; Owen, T. W.; Huang, A.; McKittrick, D. A. (1999). “Global rural temperature trends”. Geophysical Research Letters. 26 (3): 329–332. Bibcode:1999GeoRL..26..329P. doi:10.1029/1998GL900322.
  51. ^ J. Zhang, Guang; Cai, Ming; Hu, Aixue (27 January 2013). “Energy consumption and the unexplained winter warming over northern Asia and North America”. Nature Climate Change. 3 (5): 466–470. Bibcode:2013NatCC…3..466Z. doi:10.1038/nclimate1803.
  52. ^ Broadbent, Ashley Mark; Krayenhoff, Eric Scott; Georgescu, Matei (13 August 2020). “The motley drivers of heat and cold exposure in 21st century US cities”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117 (35): 21108–21117. Bibcode:2020PNAS..11721108B. doi:10.1073/pnas.2005492117. PMC 7474622. PMID 32817528.
  53. ^ Clarke, J. F. (1972). “Some effects of the urban structure on heat mortality”. Environmental Research. 5 (1): 93–104. Bibcode:1972ER……5…93C. doi:10.1016/0013-9351(72)90023-0. PMID 5032928.
  54. ^ Kovats, R. Sari; Hajat, Shakoor (April 2008). “Heat Stress and Public Health: A Critical Review”. Annual Review of Public Health. 29 (1): 41–55. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090843. PMID 18031221.
  55. ^ Jump up to:a b Gunawardena, K. R. (2015). Heat vulnerability: risk to health and wellbeing in the built environment [M.Phil Paper], University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
  56. ^ Adams-Fuller, Terri (2023-07-01). “Extreme Heat Is Deadlier Than Hurricanes, Floods and Tornadoes Combined”. Scientific American. Retrieved 2024-05-02.
  57. ^ “The Impacts of Extreme Heat on Mental Health”. Psychiatric Times. 2019-07-30. Retrieved 2024-05-02.
  58. ^ Cho, Hyunkuk (May 2017). “The effects of summer heat on academic achievement: A cohort analysis”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 83: 185–196. Bibcode:2017JEEM…83..185C. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2017.03.005.
  59. ^ Jump up to:a b c d “Assessment of International Urban Heat Island Research” (PDF). U.S. Department of Energy Report. Navigant Consulting. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 February 2013. Retrieved 30 April 2014.
  60. ^ Jump up to:a b Koppe, Christina; Kovats, Sari; Jendritzky, Gerd; Menne, Bettina (2004). “Heat-waves: risks and responses”. Health and Global Environmental Change Series. 2. Archived from the original on 2023-03-22. Retrieved 2014-05-07.
  61. ^ Jump up to:a b Gunawardena, K. (2018). Fundamentals of Urban Heat Islands: Concise guide for architects and urban planners, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
  62. ^ Shi, Yuan; Katzschner, Lutz; Ng, Edward (March 2018). “Modelling the fine-scale spatiotemporal pattern of urban heat island effect using land use regression approach in a megacity”. Science of the Total Environment. 618: 891–904. Bibcode:2018ScTEn.618..891S. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.252. PMID 29096959.
  63. ^ Wang, Pin; Goggins, William B.; Shi, Yuan; Zhang, Xuyi; Ren, Chao; Ka-Lun Lau, Kevin (June 2021). “Long-term association between urban air ventilation and mortality in Hong Kong”. Environmental Research. 197: 111000. Bibcode:2021ER….19711000W. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2021.111000. PMID 33745928. S2CID 232310626.
  64. ^ Weng, Qihao; Firozjaei, Mohammad Karimi; Sedighi, Amir; Kiavarz, Majid; Alavipanah, Seyed Kazem (19 May 2019). “Statistical analysis of surface urban heat island intensity variations: A case study of Babol city, Iran”. GIScience & Remote Sensing. 56 (4): 576–604. Bibcode:2019GISRS..56..576W. doi:10.1080/15481603.2018.1548080. S2CID 134003294.
  65. ^ Yuan, F. (2007). “Comparison of impervious surface area and normalized difference vegetation index as indicators of surface urban heat island effects in Landsat imagery”. Remote Sensing of Environment. 106 (3): 375–386. Bibcode:2007RSEnv.106..375Y. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.09.003.
  66. ^ NYS DEC. “Streams Tributary to Onondaga Lake Biological Assessment.” Dec.ny.gov. N.p., 2008. Web. 12 September 2013.
  67. ^ “Fish Kill Event – McLoud Run”. Iowa DNR Fish Kill Database.
  68. ^ Tipler, Paul A. & Mosca, Gene (2007). Physics for Scientists and Engineers. Macmillan. p. 686. ISBN 978-1-4292-0124-7.
  69. ^ “Urban Climate – Climate Study and UHI”. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2009-02-09. Retrieved 2009-06-18.
  70. ^ “Islands in the Sun”. Institute on the Environment. University of Minnesota. Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2014-11-11.
  71. ^ “Cool Pavement Report” (PDF). Environmental Protection Agency. June 2005. pp. 21, 43. Retrieved 2013-01-15.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b c Shochat, Eyal; Warren, Paige S.; Faeth, Stanley H.; Mclntyre, Nancy E.; Hope, Diane (April 2006). “From Patterns to Emerging Processes in Mechanistic Urban Ecology”. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 21 (4): 186–91. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.11.019. PMID 16701084.
  73. ^ Tang, Teri (2014-06-05). “Where are the Insects?”. School of Life Sciences. Arizona State University. Retrieved 19 October 2014.
  74. ^ Chang, Sheng-chieh (2000-06-23). “Energy Use”. Environmental Energies Technology Division. Archived from the original on March 11, 2009. Retrieved 2009-06-18.
  75. ^ “Aging and Weathering of Cool Roofing Membranes” (PDF). Cool Roofing Symposium. 2005-08-23. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-11-15. Retrieved 2010-08-16.
  76. ^ Jump up to:a b Rosenfeld, Arthur H.; Akbari, Hashem; Romm, Joseph J.; Pomerantz, Melvin (1998). “Cool communities: strategies for heat island mitigation and smog reduction” (PDF). Energy and Buildings. 28 (1): 51–62. Bibcode:1998EneBu..28…51R. doi:10.1016/S0378-7788(97)00063-7.
  77. ^ Salamanca, F.; Georgescu, M.; Mahalov, A.; Moustaoui, M.; Wang, M. (27 May 2014). “Anthropogenic heating of the urban environment due to air conditioning”. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 119 (10): 5949–5965. Bibcode:2014JGRD..119.5949S. doi:10.1002/2013JD021225.
  78. ^ Jump up to:a b “Making roofs white or reflective is the best way to keep a city cool”. New Scientist. Retrieved 2024-07-11.
  79. ^ Albers, R. A. W.; Bosch, P. R.; Blocken, B.; van den Dobbelsteen, A. A. J. F.; van Hove, L. W. A.; Spit, T. J. M.; van de Ven, F.; van Hooff, T.; Rovers, V. (January 2015). “Overview of challenges and achievements in the climate adaptation of cities and in the Climate Proof Cities program” (PDF). Building and Environment. 83: 1–10. Bibcode:2015BuEnv..83….1A. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.09.006. hdl:1874/309149.
  80. ^ Michał Kaszewski: „Miejska wyspa ciepła – sposoby jej ograniczania”: Wykład popularno-naukowy: „Miejska wyspa ciepła – sposoby jej ograniczania”[unreliable source?]
  81. ^ Gunawardena, K. R.; Wells, M. J.; Kershaw, T. (2017-04-15). “Utilising green and bluespace to mitigate urban heat island intensity”. Science of the Total Environment. 584–585: 1040–1055. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.158. ISSN 0048-9697.
  82. ^ Gunawardena, K. R., & Kershaw, T. (2016). Green and blue-space significance to urban heat island mitigation. In S. Emmit & K. Adeyeye, eds., Integrated Design International Conference (ID@50), Bath: University of Bath, pp. 1–15.
  83. ^ Jump up to:a b Rosenfeld, Arthur H.; Romm, Joseph J.; Akbari, Hashem; Lloyd, Alan C. (February 1997). “Painting the town white—and green”. Technology Review. 100 (2): 52–59.
  84. ^ “Top 22 Benefits of Trees”. Tree People. Retrieved 7 July 2014.
  85. ^ “Trees and Vegetation”. EPA.gov. 2014-02-28. Retrieved 7 July 2014.
  86. ^ Jump up to:a b c Zinzi, M.; Agnoli, S. (2012). “Cool and green roofs. An energy and comfort comparison between passive cooling and mitigation urban heat island techniques for residential buildings in the Mediterranean region”. Energy and Buildings. 55: 66–76. Bibcode:2012EneBu..55…66Z. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.09.024.
  87. ^ “Comprehensive Cool Roof Guide from the Vinyl Roofing Division of the Chemical Fabrics and Film Association”. Archived from the original on 2013-09-21.
  88. ^ “Cool Pavement Report” (PDF). Environmental Protection Agency. June 2005. p. 14. Retrieved 2009-02-06.
  89. ^ Gore, Al; Steffen, A. (2008). World Changing: A User’s Guide for the 21st Century. New York: Abrams. p. 258.
  90. ^ Yaghoobian, N.; Kleissl, J. (2012). “Effect of reflective pavements on building energy use”. Urban Climate. 2: 25–42. Bibcode:2012UrbCl…2…25Y. doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2012.09.002.
  91. ^ Yang, Jiachuan; Wang, Zhihua; Kaloush, Kamil E. (October 2013), Unintended Consequences: A Research Synthesis Examining the Use of Reflective Pavements to Mitigate the Urban Heat Island Effect (PDF), Tempe, Arizona: NCE SMART Innovations, archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-12-02, retrieved 2013-11-25
  92. ^ “Whitest-ever paint could help cool heating Earth, study shows”. The Guardian. April 15, 2021. Retrieved April 16, 2021.
  93. ^ Li, Xiangyu; Peoples, Joseph; Yao, Peiyan; Ruan, Xiulin (12 May 2021). “Ultrawhite BaSO 4 Paints and Films for Remarkable Daytime Subambient Radiative Cooling”. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 13 (18): 21733–21739. doi:10.1021/acsami.1c02368. PMID 33856776. S2CID 233259255.
  94. ^ “Green (Planted) Roofs”. Archived from the original on 2011-07-28. Retrieved 2010-08-07.
  95. ^ Liu, Hongqing; Kong, Fanhua; Yin, Haiwei; Middel, Ariane; Zheng, Xiandi; Huang, Jing; Xu, Hairong; Wang, Ding; Wen, Zhihao (2021). “Impacts of green roofs on water, temperature, and air quality: A bibliometric review”. Building and Environment. 196: 107794. Bibcode:2021BuEnv.19607794L. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107794. ISSN 0360-1323.
  96. ^ “Four Barriers to Implementing Green Roofs – And How to Overcome Them | Nicole Holmes”. Living Architecture Monitor. Retrieved 2024-07-01.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c Teotónio, Inês; Silva, Cristina Matos; Cruz, Carlos Oliveira (2021). “Economics of green roofs and green walls: A literature review”. Sustainable Cities and Society. 69: 102781. Bibcode:2021SusCS..6902781T. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102781. ISSN 2210-6707.
  98. ^ Feng, Haibo; Hewage, Kasun N. (2018). “Economic benefits and costs of green roofs”. Nature based strategies for urban and building sustainability. Butterworth-Heinemann. pp. 307–318. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-812150-4.00028-8. ISBN 978-0-12-812150-4.
  99. ^ “Stormwater Management Objectives” (PDF). www.gosnells.wa.gov.au.
  100. ^ Wang, Junsong; Meng, Qinglin; Zou, Ya; Qi, Qianlong; Tan, Kanghao; Santamouris, Mat; He, Bao-Jie (August 2022). “Performance synergism of pervious pavement on stormwater management and urban heat island mitigation: A review of its benefits, key parameters, and co-benefits approach”. Water Research. 221: 118755. Bibcode:2022WatRe.22118755W. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2022.118755. PMID 35728492.
  101. ^ Hiltrud Pötz & Pierre Bleuze (2011). Urban green-blue grids for sustainable and dynamic cities. Delft: Coop for life. ISBN 978-90-818804-0-4.
  102. ^ Chiesura, Anna (2004). “The role of urban parks for the sustainable city”. Landscape and Urban Planning. 68 (1): 129–138. Bibcode:2004LUrbP..68..129C. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.003.
  103. ^ “Sustainable trade infrastructure in Africa: A key element for growth and prosperity?”. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development.
  104. ^ “Nachhaltigesinvestment 2016”. Archived from the original on 2017-01-23. Retrieved 2022-03-19.
  105. ^ Staddon, Chad; Ward, Sarah; De Vito, Laura; Zuniga-Teran, Adriana; Gerlak, Andrea K.; Schoeman, Yolandi; Hart, Aimee; Booth, Giles (September 2018). “Contributions of green infrastructure to enhancing urban resilience”. Environment Systems and Decisions. 38 (3): 330–338. Bibcode:2018EnvSD..38..330S. doi:10.1007/s10669-018-9702-9. S2CID 62800263.
  106. ^ Heo, Se-Yeon; Lee, Gil Ju; Song, Young Min (2022). “Heat-shedding with photonic structures: radiative cooling and its potential”. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 10 (27): 9915–9937. doi:10.1039/D2TC00318J. S2CID 249695930.
  107. ^ Zhou, Kai; Miljkovic, Nenad; Cai, Lili (March 2021). “Performance analysis on system-level integration and operation of daytime radiative cooling technology for air-conditioning in buildings”. Energy and Buildings. 235: 110749. Bibcode:2021EneBu.23510749Z. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110749. S2CID 234180182.
  108. ^ Howard, Luke (2012) [1818]. The Climate of London Deduced from Meteorological Observations. Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781108049511.
  109. ^ Heidorn, Keith C. (2009). “Luke Howard: The Man Who Named The Clouds”. Islandnet.com. Retrieved 2009-06-18.
  110. ^ Stewart, Iain D. (December 2019). “Why should urban heat island researchers study history?”. Urban Climate. 30: 100484. Bibcode:2019UrbCl..3000484S. doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100484. S2CID 203337407.
  111. ^ Masson, Valéry; Lemonsu, Aude; Hidalgo, Julia; Voogt, James (2020-10-17). “Urban Climates and Climate Change”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 45 (1): 411–444. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-083623.
  112. ^ Díaz, J.; Jordán, A.; García, R.; López, C.; Alberdi, J.; Hernández, E.; Otero, A. (1 February 2014). “Heat waves in Madrid 1986–1997: effects on the health of the elderly”. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 75 (3): 163–170. doi:10.1007/s00420-001-0290-4. PMID 11954983. S2CID 31284700.
  113. ^ Harlan, Sharon L.; Brazel, Anthony J.; Prashad, Lela; Stefanov, William L.; Larsen, Larissa (December 2006). “Neighborhood microclimates and vulnerability to heat stress”. Social Science & Medicine. 63 (11): 2847–2863. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.07.030. hdl:2286/R.I.55228. PMID 16996668.
  114. ^ US Environmental Protection Agency, OAR (2019-11-06). “Heat Islands and Equity”. www.epa.gov. Retrieved 2024-04-18.
  115. ^ Wilson, Bev (October 2020). “Urban Heat Management and the Legacy of Redlining”. Journal of the American Planning Association. 86 (4): 443–457. doi:10.1080/01944363.2020.1759127.
  116. ^ Adams, Kaitlyn; Knuth, Colette Steward (January 2024). “The effect of urban heat islands on pediatric asthma exacerbation: How race plays a role”. Urban Climate. 53: 101833. Bibcode:2024UrbCl..5301833A. doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2024.101833.
  117. ^ Zhu, Pengyu; Zhang, Yaoqi (March 2008). “Demand for urban forests in United States cities”. Landscape and Urban Planning. 84 (3–4): 293–300. Bibcode:2008LUrbP..84..293Z. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.005.
  118. ^ De Chant, Tim (2008). “Urban Trees Reveal Income Inequality”. Landscape and Urban Planning. 84 (3). Per Square Mile. Bibcode:2008LUrbP..84..293Z. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.005. Retrieved 7 May 2014.
  119. ^ Chant, Tim (2008). “Urban Trees reveal income inequality”. Landscape and Urban Planning. 84 (3). Bibcode:2008LUrbP..84..293Z. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.005. Retrieved 7 July 2014.
  120. ^ DeSilver, Drew (2021-08-02). “As national eviction ban expires, a look at who rents and who owns in the U.S.” Pew Research Center. Retrieved 2024-05-02.
  121. ^ Ramirez, Rachel (2022-07-20). “Faced with more deadly heat waves, US cities are taking an unprecedented step”. CNN. Archived from the original on 2023-01-06. Retrieved 2023-01-06.
  122. ^ Moloney, Anastasia (2022-11-09). “How ‘chief heat officers’ keep cities cool as the world warms”. Reuters. Archived from the original on 2023-01-06. Retrieved 2023-01-06.
  123. ^ Markey, Edward J. (2020-07-22). “S.4280 – 116th Congress (2019–2020): Preventing HEAT Illness and Deaths Act of 2020”. www.congress.gov. Retrieved 2021-10-26.
  124. ^ “New federal bill supports heat island mitigation”. U.S. Green Building Council. Retrieved 2021-10-26.
  125. ^ New York City Regional Heat Island Initiative (October 2006). “Mitigating New York City’s Heat Island With Urban Forestry, Living Roofs, and Light Surfaces” (PDF). New York State Energy Research and Development Authority. p. ii. Retrieved 2009-06-18.[permanent dead link]
  126. ^ Wilmsen, Carl. Partnerships for Empowerment: Participatory Research for Community-based Natural Resource Management. London, England: Earthscan, 2008. Print.
  127. ^ “Cool solutions for urban heat islands | Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment”. woods.stanford.edu. October 26, 2023. Retrieved 2024-05-02.
  128. ^ KristinaP. “Collaborative Heat Mapping Research Project”. Virginia Foundation for Independent Colleges. Retrieved 2024-05-02.
  129. ^ “Cool Neighborhoods NYC”. NYC Mayor’s Office of Climate and Environmental Justice. 2017-06-14. Retrieved 2024-05-02.
  130. ^ Balasubramanian, D. (2020-02-15). “Urban heat islands in India”. The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 2024-10-23.
  131. ^ “Mumbai’s spendings will be double of New York’s to manage urban heat generated due to concretisation”. The Times of India. 2024-02-06. ISSN 0971-8257. Retrieved 2024-10-23.

Table of Contents

The post Heat Island Reduction, Non-roof: 50%, 75% appeared first on demingworld.in.

The post Heat Island Reduction, Non-roof: 50%, 75% appeared first on demingworld.in.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Facebook X-twitter Linkedin Youtube
You have been successfully Subscribed! Ops! Something went wrong, please try again.

Newsroom

  • Equal Opportunity
  • Legal Disclaimer

Admission

  • Apply to Vrindawan
  • Programmes
  • Programmes by Qualification

Business

Technology

EdTech

Education

Disclaimer

Trems & Conditions

Refund Policy

Shipping Policy

Privacy Policy For Google

Community

Health

Empowerment

Environment

Media Gallery

  • Audio Gallery

About

The mayu Group

Mayu Code of Conduct

Values and Purpose

Leadership

Sustainability

Innovation

Sponsorships

Investors

Sitemap

© 2024 Created with mayugroup.com

Scroll to Top