Eco-friendly Commuting Practices : 25%, 50%

Eco-friendly Commuting Practices : 25%, 50%- I understand that you are asking for information about eco-friendly commuting practices. To better understand your request, I’d like to know what you mean by “25%, 50%”.

Here are some possible interpretations:

Cost savings: You may be interested in knowing how much money can be saved by adopting eco-friendly commuting practices.

Percentage of people who adopt eco-friendly commuting: You may be interested in knowing what percentage of the population or a specific group of people use eco-friendly commuting methods.

Reduction in carbon emissions: You may be interested in knowing how much carbon emissions can be reduced by adopting eco-friendly commuting practices.

What is Required Eco-friendly Commuting Practices : 25%, 50%

The “25%, 50%” likely refers to a target or goal for eco-friendly commuting adoption within a community or organization.

Here’s a breakdown of what might be considered “required” eco-friendly commuting practices, along with how they could contribute to those targets:

Eco-friendly Commuting Practices

• Public Transportation:
  • 25%: A significant portion of commuters utilize buses, trains, subways, or light rail.
  • 50%: A substantial majority rely on public transport, indicating a strong shift towards sustainable commuting.
• Cycling:
  • 25%: A noticeable number of people bike to work or school.
  • 50%: Cycling becomes a highly popular and viable commuting option, often supported by dedicated bike lanes and infrastructure.  
• Walking:
  • 25%: Walking is a common choice for short commutes, especially in walkable neighborhoods.
  • 50%: Walking becomes a primary mode of transportation for many, further reducing reliance on motorized vehicles.
• Carpooling/Ridesharing:
  • 25%: A considerable number of people share rides to work or school, reducing the number of vehicles on the road.
  • 50%: Carpooling and ridesharing become the norm, significantly impacting traffic congestion and emissions.
• Telecommuting/Remote Work:
  • 25%: A portion of the workforce regularly works from home, eliminating the need for daily commutes.
  • 50%: Remote work becomes a widespread and accepted practice, leading to a dramatic reduction in commuting overall.
• Electric Vehicles (EVs):
  • 25%: A notable number of commuters utilize electric or hybrid vehicles.
  • 50%: EVs become the dominant mode of personal transportation, significantly reducing emissions.

Key Considerations

• Infrastructure: The availability and quality of public transportation, bike lanes, sidewalks, and charging stations for EVs are crucial for encouraging these practices.
• Incentives: Governments and employers can incentivize eco-friendly commuting through subsidies, tax breaks, and preferential parking for carpoolers.  
• Education and Awareness: Public education campaigns can raise awareness of the benefits of eco-friendly commuting and encourage behavioral change.  

By implementing a combination of these practices, communities and organizations can work towards achieving their 25% and 50% targets for sustainable commuting, leading to significant environmental and social benefits.

Who is Required Eco-friendly Commuting Practices : 25%, 50%

Courtesy: Green Life Guide

The “25%, 50%” likely refers to a target or goal for eco-friendly commuting adoption within a community or organization.

Who might be “required” to participate can vary depending on the specific context:

• Employees:
  • Companies: Companies may set targets for their employees to use eco-friendly commuting methods. This could be encouraged through incentives, but rarely legally mandated.
• Government Employees:
  • Government Agencies: Government agencies may have internal policies or mandates for their employees to prioritize eco-friendly commuting.
• Residents:
  • Cities/Towns: Some cities or towns might implement policies to encourage residents to adopt eco-friendly commuting habits, such as:
    • Congestion pricing: Charging fees for driving in certain areas during peak hours.
    • Parking restrictions: Limiting parking availability for single-occupant vehicles.
    • Investing in infrastructure: Improving public transportation, bike lanes, and walking paths.

Important Note:

• Mandates are rare: While some policies may strongly encourage eco-friendly commuting, outright mandates for individuals are uncommon.
• Focus on incentives: Most efforts to promote eco-friendly commuting focus on providing incentives and making sustainable options more convenient and appealing.

In summary: While the specific “who” can vary, the goal is often to encourage a significant portion of the population or workforce to adopt eco-friendly commuting practices to reduce environmental impact and improve overall quality of life.

When is Required Eco-friendly Commuting Practices : 25%, 50%

The “when” of requiring eco-friendly commuting practices is often tied to:

• Sustainability Goals:
  • Company-wide: Companies may set internal sustainability goals (e.g., reduce carbon emissions by X% by a certain year) and include eco-friendly commuting as a key strategy to achieve them.
  • City/Regional Goals: Local governments may establish targets for reducing traffic congestion or improving air quality, which necessitate increased adoption of eco-friendly commuting.
• Policy Changes:
  • New Legislation: Governments may introduce new laws or regulations that incentivize or even mandate certain eco-friendly commuting behaviors.
  • Infrastructure Development: Significant investments in public transportation, bike lanes, and walking paths can signal a shift towards prioritizing sustainable commuting.
• Social and Cultural Shifts:
  • Increased Awareness: Growing public awareness of climate change and environmental issues can drive demand for more sustainable transportation options.
  • Changing Attitudes: A shift in societal norms and values towards prioritizing environmental responsibility can influence individual commuting choices.

It’s important to note:

• Gradual Implementation: The transition to more eco-friendly commuting practices is typically gradual and involves a combination of incentives, infrastructure improvements, and changes in policies.
• No Single Timeline: The specific timeline for achieving 25% or 50% eco-friendly commuting rates will vary greatly depending on the specific context, available resources, and the effectiveness of implemented strategies.

In essence, the “when” is a continuous and evolving process, driven by a combination of factors and influenced by ongoing efforts to create a more sustainable transportation system.

Where is Required Eco-friendly Commuting Practices : 25%, 50%

The “where” of required eco-friendly commuting practices can refer to several aspects:

• Geographic Location:
  • Cities and Urban Areas: Cities with high population density and significant traffic congestion often have the strongest emphasis on eco-friendly commuting. This is due to the need to reduce air pollution, traffic congestion, and reliance on private vehicles.
  • Regions with Environmental Concerns: Areas with sensitive ecosystems or high levels of air pollution may have stronger regulations and incentives for eco-friendly commuting.
  • Campus Settings: Universities and colleges may have specific targets for eco-friendly commuting among students, faculty, and staff.
• Specific Locations within a City/Region:
  • Business Districts: Companies located in densely populated business districts may be more likely to encourage or require eco-friendly commuting from their employees due to parking limitations and traffic congestion.
  • Government Facilities: Government offices may prioritize eco-friendly commuting for their employees as part of their sustainability initiatives.
• Types of Transportation:
  • Public Transportation Hubs: Areas surrounding major public transportation hubs are often targeted for increased eco-friendly commuting options.
  • Bike Lanes and Walking Paths: The presence of well-developed bike lanes and pedestrian infrastructure can encourage cycling and walking as viable commuting options.

In essence, the “where” of required eco-friendly commuting practices can vary significantly depending on the specific context, local conditions, and the goals of the initiative.

How is Required Eco-friendly Commuting Practices : 25%, 50%

Courtesy: My Green Steps

The “how” of achieving 25% and 50% eco-friendly commuting rates involves a multi-pronged approach:

1. Infrastructure Development:

• Robust Public Transportation:
  • Invest in: Frequent and reliable bus, train, and subway systems.
  • Improve: Accessibility, safety, and affordability of public transport.
• Dedicated Cycling and Walking Infrastructure:
  • Build: Safe and well-maintained bike lanes, pedestrian paths, and sidewalks.
  • Create: Designated bike parking and secure storage facilities.
• Charging Infrastructure for EVs:
  • Expand: Public charging stations in convenient locations.
  • Incentivize: Home charging station installation.

2. Policy and Incentives:

• Employer Incentives:
  • Offer: Subsidies for public transportation passes.  
  • Provide: Flexible work arrangements (telecommuting, flexible hours).
  • Incentivize: Carpooling and bike-to-work programs.  
• Government Incentives:
  • Tax breaks: For purchasing EVs, using public transportation, or biking to work.
  • Congestion pricing: Discourage single-occupancy vehicle use in congested areas.
  • Parking restrictions: Limit parking availability for single-occupant vehicles.
• Employee Benefits:
  • Offer: On-site bike repair and shower facilities.  
  • Provide: Subsidies for bike purchases or safety gear.

3. Education and Awareness:

• Public Campaigns:
  • Raise awareness: Of the benefits of eco-friendly commuting (health, environmental, economic).
  • Promote: Available transportation options and their benefits.
• Community Outreach:
  • Organize: Bike-to-work days, walking challenges, and carpooling events.
  • Engage: With local businesses and community groups to promote sustainable commuting.
• School Programs:
  • Educate: Children and young adults about the importance of sustainable transportation.
  • Promote: Walking and biking to school.

4. Technology and Innovation:

• Develop: Advanced public transportation systems (e.g., autonomous vehicles, on-demand transit).
• Promote: Smart mobility solutions (e.g., real-time traffic information, ride-sharing apps).
• Invest: In research and development of sustainable transportation technologies.

By implementing a combination of these strategies, cities and communities can create an environment that encourages and supports eco-friendly commuting, ultimately leading to a more sustainable and livable future.

Case Study on Eco-friendly Commuting Practices : 25%, 50%

Copenhagen, Denmark – A Model for Eco-Friendly Commuting

Context: Copenhagen, Denmark, is renowned for its high rates of eco-friendly commuting and has become a global model for sustainable urban mobility.  

Target: The city has aimed to achieve a significant shift towards sustainable commuting, with specific targets for reducing car dependence and increasing the share of cycling and public transport.  

Key Strategies:

1. Prioritizing Cycling:
   • Extensive Bike Lane Network: Copenhagen boasts an extensive and well-maintained network of bike lanes, making cycling safe and convenient for people of all ages.  
   • Bike Parking: Ample and secure bike parking facilities are available throughout the city.  
   • Bike-Friendly Infrastructure: Traffic calming measures, such as speed bumps and dedicated bike signals, prioritize cyclist safety.  
2. Investing in Public Transportation:
   • Efficient and Reliable System: Copenhagen has a highly efficient and reliable public transportation system, including buses, trains, and a metro system.  
   • Integration: Seamless integration between different modes of public transport is ensured.
   • Accessibility: Public transport is made accessible to people with disabilities.  
3. Discouraging Car Use:
   • Congestion Pricing: A congestion charge is implemented in the city center, discouraging car use during peak hours.
   • Parking Restrictions: Limited parking availability and high parking fees deter car use.
   • Prioritizing Public Space: Road space is prioritized for public transport, cycling, and pedestrians, rather than private vehicles.
4. Promoting Car-Sharing and Ride-Sharing:
   • Car-sharing programs: Encourage shared car ownership and reduce the need for individual car ownership.
   • Ride-sharing platforms: Promote the use of ride-sharing apps to optimize car usage and reduce traffic congestion.
5. Public Awareness Campaigns:
   • Education and Outreach: Extensive public awareness campaigns promote the benefits of cycling, walking, and public transport.  
   • Community Engagement: Involve citizens in the planning and implementation of sustainable transportation initiatives.

Results:

• High Rates of Cycling: Copenhagen has one of the highest rates of cycling in the world, with over 50% of residents cycling to work or school.  
• Reduced Car Dependence: Car ownership rates are lower than in many other European cities.
• Improved Air Quality: Reduced car use has significantly improved air quality in the city.  
• Enhanced Quality of Life: Cycling and walking promote physical activity and contribute to a healthier lifestyle.  

Lessons Learned:

• Long-term Vision: Sustainable transportation initiatives require long-term planning and consistent investment.
• Holistic Approach: A combination of infrastructure improvements, policy changes, and public awareness campaigns is crucial for success.
• Citizen Engagement: Involving citizens in the planning and implementation process is essential for ensuring buy-in and long-term sustainability.

Conclusion:

The case of Copenhagen demonstrates that a comprehensive and integrated approach to sustainable transportation can lead to significant reductions in car dependence and improvements in air quality and public health. By prioritizing cycling, investing in public transport, and discouraging car use, cities can create a more sustainable and livable urban environment for their residents.

Note: While Copenhagen has achieved remarkable success, it is important to acknowledge that the specific strategies and their effectiveness may vary depending on the context and characteristics of different cities.

White paper on Eco-friendly Commuting Practices : 25%, 50%

Achieving 25% and 50% Eco-Friendly Commuting Rates

1. Introduction

This white paper explores the critical need to shift towards eco-friendly commuting practices, outlining strategies to achieve 25% and 50% adoption rates. The focus is on reducing reliance on private vehicles and promoting sustainable transportation options.

2. The Urgency of Eco-Friendly Commuting

• Environmental Impact:
  • Transportation is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, air pollution, and climate change.
  • Reducing reliance on private vehicles is crucial for mitigating these impacts.
• Urban Congestion:
  • Traffic congestion leads to wasted time, increased stress, and reduced productivity.
  • Sustainable commuting options can alleviate traffic congestion and improve urban mobility.
• Public Health:
  • Active commuting (walking and cycling) promotes physical and mental well-being.
  • Reduced air pollution improves respiratory health.

3. Defining Eco-Friendly Commuting

Eco-friendly commuting encompasses a range of transportation modes that minimize environmental impact:

• Public Transportation: Buses, trains, subways, light rail.
• Cycling: Bicycles, e-bikes.
• Walking:
• Carpooling/Ridesharing: Sharing vehicles with others.
• Telecommuting/Remote Work: Working from home.
• Electric Vehicles (EVs):

4. Strategies for Achieving 25% and 50% Adoption

4.1. Infrastructure Development

• Robust Public Transportation:
  • Invest in frequent, reliable, and affordable public transport systems.
  • Improve accessibility for people with disabilities.
• Dedicated Cycling and Walking Infrastructure:
  • Build safe and well-maintained bike lanes, pedestrian paths, and sidewalks.
  • Create secure bike parking facilities.
• Charging Infrastructure for EVs:
  • Expand the network of public charging stations.
  • Incentivize home charging station installation.

4.2. Policy and Incentives

• Employer Incentives:
  • Offer subsidies for public transportation passes.
  • Provide flexible work arrangements (telecommuting, flexible hours).
  • Incentivize carpooling and bike-to-work programs.
• Government Incentives:
  • Tax breaks for purchasing EVs, using public transportation, or biking to work.
  • Congestion pricing to discourage single-occupancy vehicle use.
  • Parking restrictions to limit parking availability for single-occupant vehicles.
• Employee Benefits:
  • Offer on-site bike repair and shower facilities.
  • Provide subsidies for bike purchases or safety gear.

4.3. Education and Awareness

• Public Campaigns:
  • Raise awareness of the benefits of eco-friendly commuting.
  • Promote available transportation options and their benefits.
• Community Outreach:
  • Organize bike-to-work days, walking challenges, and carpooling events.
  • Engage with local businesses and community groups to promote sustainable commuting.
• School Programs:
  • Educate children and young adults about the importance of sustainable transportation.
  • Promote walking and biking to school.

4.4. Technology and Innovation

• Develop: Advanced public transportation systems (e.g., autonomous vehicles, on-demand transit).
• Promote: Smart mobility solutions (e.g., real-time traffic information, ride-sharing apps).
• Invest: In research and development of sustainable transportation technologies.

5. Conclusion

Achieving 25% and 50% eco-friendly commuting rates requires a multi-faceted approach that addresses infrastructure, policy, incentives, education, and technology. By implementing these strategies, we can create a more sustainable, equitable, and livable future for all.

6. Recommendations

• Prioritize investment: In sustainable transportation infrastructure and initiatives.
• Develop comprehensive plans: To address the specific needs and challenges of each community.
• Monitor progress: Regularly track progress towards achieving the 25% and 50% targets.
• Continuously evaluate and adapt: Strategies based on data and feedback.

Note: This white paper provides a general framework. Specific strategies and targets will need to be tailored to the unique context of each city or region.

Disclaimer: This white paper provides general information and should not be considered professional advice.

This white paper can be further expanded by:

• Including case studies of successful eco-friendly commuting initiatives.
• Analyzing the economic benefits of sustainable commuting.
• Addressing potential barriers to eco-friendly commuting and strategies to overcome them.
• Conducting further research and data analysis to inform policy decisions.

Industrial Application of Eco-friendly Commuting Practices : 25%, 50%

Courtesy: Englishelp

Introduction

Industrial sectors play a significant role in daily commutes, impacting both the environment and employee well-being. Encouraging eco-friendly commuting practices within industrial settings can yield substantial benefits, including reduced carbon footprint, improved employee health, and enhanced company image. This white paper explores strategies to achieve 25% and 50% adoption rates of eco-friendly commuting within industrial environments.

Challenges and Considerations

• Shift Work: Irregular work schedules can complicate the use of public transportation or cycling.
• Remote Locations: Some industrial sites may be located in remote areas with limited access to public transport or cycling infrastructure.
• Heavy Equipment Use: Employees may require the use of personal vehicles to transport tools or equipment.
• Safety Concerns: Safety considerations may be paramount in certain industrial settings, influencing commuting choices.

Strategies for Achieving 25% and 50% Adoption

1. Infrastructure Development:

• Improve Public Transportation Access:
  • Advocate for and support the extension of public transport routes to industrial areas.
  • Collaborate with public transport providers to offer flexible schedules and routes that cater to shift workers.
• Enhance Cycling and Walking Infrastructure:
  • Invest in secure bike parking facilities, showers, and changing rooms.
  • Improve pedestrian and cycling paths around industrial sites.
• Electric Vehicle Charging Stations:
  • Install charging stations on-site for employee and visitor use.
  • Explore partnerships with local utility companies for infrastructure support.

2. Policy and Incentives:

• Employer Incentives:
  • Offer subsidies for public transportation passes or bike purchases.  
  • Implement flexible work arrangements (e.g., staggered shifts, compressed workweeks) to improve commuting options.
  • Incentivize carpooling arrangements with on-site parking benefits or ride-sharing subsidies.  
• Government Incentives:
  • Advocate for tax incentives for businesses that promote eco-friendly commuting.
  • Explore potential for government funding to support infrastructure improvements.

3. Education and Awareness:

• Employee Engagement:
  • Conduct employee surveys to understand commuting patterns and identify barriers to eco-friendly commuting.
  • Organize workshops and seminars to educate employees about the benefits of sustainable transportation.
  • Create internal communication channels to promote eco-friendly commuting options.  
• Community Outreach:
  • Collaborate with local communities and transportation authorities to advocate for improved infrastructure.
  • Participate in local sustainability initiatives and events.

4. Technology and Innovation:

• Explore Micro-mobility Options:
  • Evaluate the feasibility of electric scooters, bikes, or other micro-mobility options for short-distance commutes.
  • Implement secure storage and charging facilities for these options.
• Leverage Technology:
  • Utilize technology to facilitate carpooling and ridesharing among employees.  
  • Implement real-time traffic information systems to optimize commuting routes.

5. Monitoring and Evaluation

• Track progress: Regularly monitor the adoption rates of eco-friendly commuting practices.
• Gather employee feedback: Conduct surveys and focus groups to understand employee experiences and identify areas for improvement.  
• Adjust strategies: Based on data and feedback, refine and adjust strategies to achieve the 25% and 50% targets.

Conclusion

Achieving 25% and 50% eco-friendly commuting rates within industrial settings requires a multifaceted approach that addresses infrastructure, policy, incentives, and employee engagement. By implementing these strategies, industrial organizations can contribute significantly to environmental sustainability, improve employee well-being, and enhance their corporate social responsibility.

Note: This white paper provides a general framework. Specific strategies and targets will need to be tailored to the unique characteristics and challenges of each industrial site and its surrounding community.

Disclaimer: This white paper provides general information and should not be considered professional advice.

Further Research and Exploration:

• Conduct case studies of successful eco-friendly commuting initiatives in industrial settings.
• Analyze the economic benefits of sustainable commuting for industrial organizations.
• Investigate the role of technology in facilitating and optimizing eco-friendly commuting options.

By continuously evaluating and adapting strategies based on data and feedback, industrial organizations can play a vital role in promoting sustainable transportation and creating a more environmentally responsible future.

References

1. ^ “nature-friendly”. Webster’s New Millennium Dictionary of English, Preview Edition (v 0.9.7). Lexico Publishing Group, LLC.
2. ^ Motavalli, Jim (12 February 2011). “A History of Greenwashing: How Dirty Towels Impacted the Green Movement”. AOL.
3. ^ “Grønvaskere invaderer børsen” [Greenwashers invade the market]. EPN.dk (in Danish). Jyllands-Posten. 21 June 2008. Archived from the original on 5 July 2008. Retrieved 22 December 2012.
4. ^ Greenwashing Fact Sheet. 22 March 2001. Retrieved 14 November 2009. from corpwatch.org Archived 7 February 2017 at the Wayback Machine
5. ^ “Eco friendly production key to achieving sdgs”.
6. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
7. ^ “international standards for eco-labeling”. Green Seal. Archived from the original on 28 November 2012. Retrieved 9 December 2012.
8. ^ “Welcome to the European Union Eco-label Homepage”. EUROPA. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
9. ^ “EMAS”. EUROPA. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
10. ^ “Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS)”. Green Business. Retrieved 15 May 2023.
11. ^ “Minutes” (PDF). EUEB Coordination and Cooperation Management Group. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 February 2007. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
12. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Environmental Labels Type I”. Ricoh. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
13. ^ Freimann, Jurgen; Schwedes, Roswitha (2000). <99::aid-ema135>3.0.co;2-x “EMAS experiences in German companies: a survey on empirical studies”. Eco-Management and Auditing. 7 (3): 99–105. doi:10.1002/1099-0925(200009)7:3<99::aid-ema135>3.0.co;2-x. ISSN 0968-9427.
14. ^ “EUROPA – Environment – Ecolabel – FAQ”. ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 22 February 2023.
15. ^ Brécard, Dorothée; Hlaimi, Boubaker; Lucas, Sterenn; Perraudeau, Yves; Salladarré, Frédéric (15 November 2009). “Determinants of demand for green products: An application to eco-label demand for fish in Europe”. Ecological Economics. The DPSIR framework for Biodiversity Assessment. 69 (1): 115–125. Bibcode:2009EcoEc..69..115B. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.07.017. ISSN 0921-8009.
16. ^ Miras Rodríguez, María del Mar; Escobar Pérez, Bernabé; Carrasco Gallego, Amalia (2015). “Are companies less environmentally-friendly due to the crisis? Evidence from Europe”. hdl:11441/85190. ISSN 2182-8466. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
17. ^ “Environmental Claims”. Federal Trade Commission. 17 November 2008. Retrieved 17 November 2008.
18. ^ “Labels -environmentally friendly”. ecolabels. Archived from the original on 11 October 2007. Retrieved 9 July 2007.
19. ^ “About the Program”. EcoLogo. Archived from the original on 27 May 2006. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
20. ^ “Environmental Choice (Canada)”. Environment Canada. Archived from the original on 25 November 2007. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
21. ^ Stiftung, Bertelsmann. “SGI 2017 | Mexico | Environmental Policies”. www.sgi-network.org. Retrieved 19 February 2021.
22. ^ “Overview of Regulatory Requirements – Labelling and MEPS”. Energy Rating Label. Archived from the original on 1 July 2007. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
23. ^ Arnaud Bizard; Brett Lee; Karen Puterrman. “AWARE and Environmental Labeling Programs: One Step Closer to a Sustainable Economy” (PDF). ME 589. Retrieved 10 July 2007. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
24. ^ “Overview of how are star ratings calculated?”. Energy Rating Label. Archived from the original on 13 July 2007. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
25. ^ “The Energy Label”. Energy Rating Label. Archived from the original on 13 July 2007. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
26. ^ Van Yken, Jonovan; Boxall, Naomi J.; Cheng, Ka Yu; Nikoloski, Aleksandar N.; Moheimani, Navid R.; Kaksonen, Anna H. (August 2021). “E-Waste Recycling and Resource Recovery: A Review on Technologies, Barriers and Enablers with a Focus on Oceania”. Metals. 11 (8): 1313. doi:10.3390/met11081313.
27. ^ “Review of the Product Stewardship Act 2011” (PDF).
28. ^ “About Us | Pacific Environment”.
29. ^ “Cleaner Pacific 2025. Pacific Regional Waste and Pollution Management Strategy” (PDF). un.org. Retrieved 26 September 2023.
30. ^ “What is Pacwaste? | Pacific Environment”.
31. ^ Arimura, Toshi H.; Sugino, Makoto (7 August 2020). “Energy-Related Environmental Policy and Its Impacts on Energy Use in Asia”. Asian Economic Policy Review. 16 (1). Wiley: 44–61. doi:10.1111/aepr.12319. ISSN 1832-8105. S2CID 225416259.
32. ^ “S.Korea unveils ‘recharging road’ for eco-friendly buses”. phys.org. Retrieved 28 May 2021.
33. ^ Ge, Wenjun; Yang, Derong; Chen, Weineng; Li, Sheng (7 February 2023). “Can Setting Up a Carbon Trading Mechanism Improve Urban Eco-Efficiency? Evidence from China”. Sustainability. 15 (4). MDPI AG: 3014. doi:10.3390/su15043014. ISSN 2071-1050.
34. ^ “About Energy Star”. Energy Star. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
35. ^ “United States Energy Star Home Page”. Energy Star. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
36. ^ “EU Energy Star Home Page”. Energy Star. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
37. ^ “Australia Energy Star Home Page”. Energy Star. Archived from the original on 3 July 2007. Retrieved 10 July 2007.
38. ^ “Who’s Working With ENERGY STAR? International Partners”. Energy Star. Retrieved 3 February 2009.
39. ^ “Goal 17 | Department of Economic and Social Affairs”. sdgs.un.org. Retrieved 26 September 2020.

The post Eco-friendly Commuting Practices : 25%, 50% appeared first on demingworld.in.

The post Eco-friendly Commuting Practices : 25%, 50% appeared first on demingworld.in.