Off Site Renewable Energy: 25%, 50%, 75%

Off Site Renewable Energy: 25%, 50%, 75%- Off-site renewable energy refers to the use of renewable energy resources that are generated away from a company’s location, usually through power purchase agreements (PPAs) or renewable energy certificates (RECs). These percentages (25%, 50%, 75%) refer to the portion of a company’s energy consumption that is sourced from off-site renewable energy projects.

Here are some common types of off-site renewable energy:

1. Solar Energy (Photovoltaic and Solar Farms)

Solar Farms: Large-scale solar power plants located away from the company’s site can supply energy to the grid, and companies can purchase electricity from these facilities.
Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs): These agreements are typically long-term contracts that allow companies to buy energy from solar farms. The percentage (25%, 50%, 75%) could refer to the share of energy supplied from solar sources.

2. Wind Energy

Offshore Wind Farms: Wind turbines placed in bodies of water (usually in oceans) can generate large amounts of electricity. Energy produced can be purchased by companies that don’t have direct access to these wind farms.
Onshore Wind Farms: Located far from the company’s location, wind farms can also provide energy through PPAs or virtual PPAs.

3. Hydropower

Large-Scale Hydropower: Dams and hydropower stations located on rivers can generate electricity that is fed into the grid. Companies can source their energy from these plants through agreements with energy providers.
Small-Scale Hydropower: Smaller hydroelectric plants may also supply off-site renewable energy.

4. Biomass Energy

Biomass power plants, which use organic materials like wood, agricultural waste, or animal waste to generate electricity, can supply off-site renewable energy to companies.

5. Geothermal Energy

Geothermal plants harness heat from the Earth’s core to generate electricity. These plants are typically located in regions with significant geothermal activity (such as the Western U.S., Iceland, or New Zealand), and companies can source energy from these locations.

6. Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs)

Companies may buy RECs to support renewable energy generation indirectly. The percentage refers to the amount of energy a company claims to come from renewable sources, even if the energy is not directly consumed from specific projects.

Key Agreements for Off-Site Renewable Energy:

Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs): Long-term contracts for buying energy from off-site renewable projects.
Virtual Power Purchase Agreements (VPPAs): A financial agreement where the company agrees to purchase renewable energy, but the energy itself is sold to the grid.
Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs): A certificate representing the environmental attributes of the renewable energy generated, allowing companies to claim renewable energy use.

The percentage (25%, 50%, 75%) typically reflects the amount of a company’s total energy consumption that is sourced from these off-site renewable projects through PPAs or RECs.

What is Required Off Site Renewable Energy: 25%, 50%, 75%

The term “Required Off-Site Renewable Energy” at 25%, 50%, or 75% typically refers to the percentage of a company’s total energy consumption that needs to be sourced from off-site renewable energy projects. This is often part of corporate sustainability goals or commitments to reducing carbon emissions. These percentages are indicative of a company’s ambition or requirement to source a specific portion of its energy from renewable sources located away from its operations.

Here’s how these requirements are usually structured:

1. 25% Off-Site Renewable Energy

Definition: The company commits to sourcing 25% of its total energy consumption from off-site renewable energy projects such as wind, solar, hydro, or other renewable sources.
Methods: This could be achieved through power purchase agreements (PPAs), renewable energy certificates (RECs), or virtual PPAs.
Goal: This is a moderate commitment toward reducing the company’s carbon footprint and promoting renewable energy.

2. 50% Off-Site Renewable Energy

Definition: The company sets a more ambitious target by sourcing 50% of its energy from off-site renewable sources.
Methods: Companies at this level often engage in large-scale PPAs with renewable energy projects or buy RECs to match 50% of their total energy usage.
Goal: This demonstrates a stronger commitment to sustainability, often aligned with public environmental goals and regulatory frameworks.

3. 75% Off-Site Renewable Energy

Definition: Companies at this level commit to sourcing 75% of their energy from off-site renewable sources.
Methods: This could include substantial PPAs or long-term contracts with renewable energy providers, including large solar or wind farms located off-site.
Goal: This is a highly ambitious goal, often part of a company’s carbon neutrality or net-zero emissions strategy.

Why These Percentages Matter:

Sustainability Goals: Companies increasingly seek to meet renewable energy sourcing targets to align with global sustainability trends and climate action goals (e.g., Paris Agreement).
Regulatory Compliance: Many regions or governments are introducing mandates for companies to source a certain percentage of their energy from renewable sources.
Corporate Responsibility: Achieving these renewable energy goals can help a company improve its public image, appeal to environmentally conscious consumers, and attract investors focused on sustainable business practices.
Carbon Neutrality: The percentage of off-site renewable energy required can also relate to a company’s strategy to reduce its overall carbon footprint and meet climate neutrality targets.

Achieving These Requirements:

Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs): These long-term contracts allow companies to buy renewable energy directly from projects like wind farms or solar plants, even if they are far from the company’s physical location.
Virtual Power Purchase Agreements (VPPAs): Similar to PPAs, but with a financial structure where companies agree to buy renewable energy credits instead of directly consuming the energy.
Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs): Companies may purchase RECs, which represent the renewable nature of electricity generation, to meet their renewable energy goals without directly sourcing the power.

In summary, the percentages (25%, 50%, 75%) refer to the share of energy that companies need to obtain from off-site renewable projects to meet their renewable energy or carbon neutrality targets. The higher the percentage, the more ambitious the company’s commitment to renewable energy.

Who is Required Off Site Renewable Energy: 25%, 50%, 75%

The requirement for sourcing off-site renewable energy at levels like 25%, 50%, or 75% typically applies to organizations and companies that have committed to sustainability goals, climate action targets, or renewable energy sourcing standards. These requirements are often driven by internal corporate policies, external regulations, or industry standards. Here’s a breakdown of who might be required to meet these renewable energy goals:

1. Corporations and Businesses

Large Companies: Many large corporations, particularly in sectors like technology, retail, manufacturing, and finance, are committing to ambitious renewable energy goals to reduce their carbon footprint. For example:
- Tech companies like Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Apple have made major commitments to renewable energy and are often aiming for high percentages of off-site renewable energy (50% to 100%).
- Retail companies such as Walmart and Target are also increasingly focused on renewable energy as part of their corporate responsibility and sustainability efforts.
- Manufacturing and industrial firms: Companies in manufacturing and heavy industries may set targets to reduce emissions by sourcing off-site renewable energy to meet sustainability certifications or government regulations.
Energy-Intensive Industries: Industries such as steel production, cement manufacturing, and chemicals may have specific renewable energy sourcing targets as part of their decarbonization strategy.

2. Governments and Public Sector Organizations

Public Sector Entities: Government agencies or public entities may be required to meet renewable energy sourcing standards as part of climate action plans or legislative requirements. For instance:
- In the U.S., states like California have renewable portfolio standards (RPS) that require utilities and large organizations (including municipalities) to obtain a certain percentage of energy from renewable sources, often through off-site procurement.
- National Commitments: Countries that have signed international agreements like the Paris Agreement often set national renewable energy targets, which may translate into local regulations or directives for public sector entities to meet specific renewable energy requirements.

3. Utility Companies

Power Providers: Utilities that generate and distribute electricity are increasingly required to integrate a certain percentage of renewable energy into their portfolios. Many utility companies fulfill part of these requirements by sourcing energy from off-site renewable projects such as solar and wind farms.
Renewable Energy Contracts: Utilities are often involved in PPAs or purchasing renewable energy from off-site farms to meet local or national renewable energy targets.

4. Investors and Financial Institutions

Investment Firms: Institutional investors, including private equity firms, pension funds, and venture capital groups, are increasingly looking to support companies that meet renewable energy sourcing targets. As part of their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) goals, they may require companies in their portfolios to commit to sourcing off-site renewable energy at levels like 25%, 50%, or 75%.
Green Bonds and ESG Reporting: Some investors are looking for companies to meet specific renewable energy targets as a condition for issuing green bonds or as part of their sustainability reporting metrics.

5. Industries with Sustainability Certifications

Companies Seeking Green Certifications: Organizations that aim for certifications like LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), B Corporation, or those involved in climate leadership initiatives often have to demonstrate a commitment to renewable energy sourcing. These certifications may require companies to meet specific renewable energy goals, such as sourcing 25% to 75% of their energy from off-site renewable projects.

6. Large Event Organizers

Conferences, Conventions, and Festivals: Large-scale events (such as the Olympics, international conferences, or music festivals) may also have renewable energy requirements to offset their energy use. These events often commit to sourcing large percentages of energy from off-site renewable sources to meet environmental sustainability commitments.

7. Multinational Corporations Operating in Multiple Regions

Cross-Border Requirements: Multinational companies that operate in countries with strict renewable energy mandates (such as in Europe or the U.S.) may need to source a portion of their energy from off-site renewable sources to comply with regional renewable portfolio standards or climate goals.
Companies operating in markets with specific renewable energy laws might need to secure up to 75% of their energy from off-site sources to comply with local or international environmental standards.

8. Non-Profit Organizations and Foundations

Some large non-profits and foundations, particularly those focused on climate change and sustainability (like WWF or The Nature Conservancy), are committing to renewable energy targets and sourcing from off-site projects to align with their environmental goals.

In Summary:

Organizations required to source off-site renewable energy at levels such as 25%, 50%, or 75% typically include:

Large corporations (tech, manufacturing, retail)
Public sector organizations and government entities
Utility companies involved in renewable energy procurement
Investment firms with ESG goals
Companies seeking sustainability certifications
Event organizers hosting large-scale gatherings
Multinational companies with cross-border regulations
Non-profit organizations focused on sustainability

These requirements are typically driven by sustainability commitments, regulatory frameworks, and efforts to reduce carbon emissions. Companies and organizations that adopt these standards may use off-site renewable energy through mechanisms like power purchase agreements (PPAs), renewable energy certificates (RECs), and virtual power purchase agreements (VPPAs).

When is Required Off Site Renewable Energy: 25%, 50%, 75%

The timing for when a company or organization requires to source 25%, 50%, or 75% of their energy from off-site renewable sources is typically determined by a combination of internal sustainability goals, external regulatory requirements, and industry standards. The timeline for meeting these goals can vary widely based on factors like the company’s size, the region’s renewable energy mandates, and its specific sustainability targets.

Here’s a breakdown of when these requirements might apply:

1. Internal Sustainability Goals

Many companies set their own renewable energy targets to achieve specific sustainability milestones. These targets often come with deadlines that can vary from a few years to decades.
- Short-Term (1-5 years): Some companies may commit to 25% renewable energy sourcing within a few years as part of a phased approach toward larger renewable energy goals.
- Medium-Term (5-10 years): Companies aiming for 50% renewable energy sourcing might set this target to be met within 5 to 10 years, depending on their existing energy infrastructure and the availability of off-site renewable energy contracts.
- Long-Term (10+ years): For companies aiming for 75% renewable energy, this might be part of a long-term decarbonization strategy. The company might plan to hit this goal within 10-20 years as they transition away from fossil fuels and scale up their renewable energy procurement.

2. External Regulations and Mandates

Government Regulations: Many regions and countries have renewable energy mandates, often as part of broader climate goals. These requirements are set through Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) or Clean Energy Standards (CES), which often have specific compliance deadlines. The deadlines can vary by region and can be phased over time.
- For example, California has a state-level mandate for utilities to achieve 60% renewable energy by 2030, and 100% by 2045, which would apply to many companies operating in that state.
- The EU has goals for renewable energy sourcing as part of its Green Deal, and companies operating in the EU may be required to meet specific renewable energy targets by certain years (e.g., 25%, 50%, 75% of energy from renewable sources by 2030 or 2040).

3. Corporate Carbon Neutrality and Net-Zero Goals

Many companies are setting long-term net-zero emissions goals, which often include specific renewable energy targets. For instance:
- Microsoft and Google have committed to being carbon-neutral or even carbon-negative by specific dates (e.g., Microsoft by 2030), which means they must source 100% renewable energy and reduce their carbon emissions to zero through various measures.
- Companies aiming to meet 25%, 50%, or 75% renewable energy targets as part of their carbon neutrality efforts will typically set deadlines that align with their overall decarbonization strategies. These goals may be set for 2030, 2040, or 2050, depending on the company.

4. Industry and Sector-Specific Timelines

Some industries, particularly those with high energy demands or a significant carbon footprint (like manufacturing, transportation, and data centers), may be under pressure to meet renewable energy targets more quickly.
- For example, in the tech industry, companies like Google and Apple are already at 100% renewable energy sourcing, while others may be required to meet 50% by 2025, 75% by 2030, and 100% by 2040 to align with industry standards and consumer expectations.

5. Investor and Consumer Expectations

In response to growing pressure from investors (especially those focused on ESG goals) and consumers (especially those who prioritize sustainability), companies may choose to set aggressive deadlines to meet renewable energy targets. These companies might aim for:
- 25% by 2025
- 50% by 2030
- 75% by 2035 or 2040

6. PPA Contract Terms

Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) typically last 10-20 years, and the timing for when a company is required to source specific percentages of energy off-site depends on the length and start date of their renewable energy contracts.
- Companies may start with a lower commitment (e.g., 25%) and gradually increase their off-site renewable energy purchases as they sign new PPAs or expand their existing ones.

7. International Sustainability Initiatives

Some global initiatives like the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) or the RE100 commitment (a group of companies committed to 100% renewable energy) encourage companies to set renewable energy goals aligned with climate science.
- For instance, if a company joins RE100, it might be required to reach 100% renewable energy by a specific year (e.g., 2030 or 2040). As part of this, intermediate goals like 25%, 50%, or 75% renewable energy sourcing could be part of the company’s phased approach.

Example Timelines:

25% off-site renewable energy: A company may aim for this target by 2025-2030.
50% off-site renewable energy: Typically targeted for 2030-2035.
75% off-site renewable energy: Often set for 2035-2040, with 100% renewable energy being the final goal for 2040 or later.

In Summary:

The timeline for when off-site renewable energy sourcing at 25%, 50%, or 75% is required depends on:

The company’s internal sustainability targets (e.g., by 2025, 2030, 2040).
Regional and national regulations (e.g., EU and U.S. states’ renewable energy mandates).
Industry-specific pressures, such as those in the tech or energy-intensive sectors.
Investor or consumer-driven expectations for sustainability.

These timelines vary but typically fall within 5-20 years as companies align their energy sourcing with their climate action and sustainability goals.

Where is Required Off Site Renewable Energy: 25%, 50%, 75%

The requirement for off-site renewable energy (at levels such as 25%, 50%, or 75%) is driven by various factors, including regional renewable energy policies, corporate sustainability goals, and industry standards. Different regions, countries, and industries may have specific requirements or incentives for sourcing renewable energy off-site. Here’s where such requirements are commonly found:

1. Geographic Regions with Renewable Energy Mandates

United States
- Many states have Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) or Clean Energy Standards (CES) that mandate a specific percentage of energy must come from renewable sources, including off-site energy. These percentages can vary by state and may apply to utilities or large organizations operating within those states.
- For example:
  - California aims for 100% renewable energy by 2045, with increasing targets over time (e.g., 60% by 2030).
  - New York has a 50% renewable energy target by 2030, and 100% carbon-free energy by 2040.
  - Hawaii has a 100% renewable energy target by 2045.
- Many companies operating in these regions are required to meet these goals by sourcing off-site renewable energy.
European Union
- The EU Green Deal includes goals for achieving carbon neutrality by 2050. The EU Renewable Energy Directive sets targets for renewable energy sourcing that could require off-site energy procurement to meet goals like 25%, 50%, or 75% renewable energy by 2030.
- Countries like Germany, France, and Denmark are also pushing to meet aggressive renewable energy goals, where businesses may need to source a significant portion of their energy from off-site renewable sources.
United Kingdom
- The UK has a legally binding target to reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. The UK also has a Renewable Energy Guarantee of Origin (REGO) system, where businesses need to prove a percentage of their energy comes from renewable sources, and they can source this energy off-site through PPAs or certificates.
Australia
- Australia has state-specific renewable energy targets (e.g., 50% renewable energy by 2030 in some states like South Australia). Companies operating in these states might need to meet off-site renewable energy requirements to align with local regulations.
Canada
- Provinces like British Columbia and Ontario have renewable energy policies encouraging or mandating higher shares of renewable energy. Canadian companies may meet these requirements through off-site renewable energy sources.
- Quebec and Ontario have significant hydroelectric generation, but companies may also engage in wind or solar off-site energy contracts to meet their own sustainability goals.
Asia
- Japan has a target to reach 50% renewable energy by 2050. Companies in Japan may increasingly turn to off-site renewable energy sources as part of this effort.
- China, the largest renewable energy producer globally, is also making efforts to source a greater portion of its energy from renewables. Many international companies operating in China may be required to meet renewable energy sourcing goals, including off-site renewable energy.
- Countries like India have set ambitious renewable energy goals, where off-site procurement might become necessary for large companies.

2. Corporate Sustainability Goals

Tech Companies: Large tech firms like Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Amazon have set ambitious renewable energy targets, many aiming for 100% renewable energy across all operations, including off-site sources. These companies typically source a portion of their renewable energy through PPAs or virtual PPAs with off-site solar or wind farms.
Retail Giants: Companies like Walmart, Target, and IKEA also have renewable energy sourcing targets. These businesses often source off-site renewable energy to meet these goals, especially when on-site solutions are not feasible.
Energy-Intensive Industries: Manufacturing sectors (e.g., steel, cement, chemicals) may also have sustainability goals, often driven by global standards or investor pressure, which include sourcing renewable energy from off-site projects.

3. Industry Standards and Certifications

RE100: This is a global initiative of companies committed to sourcing 100% renewable energy. Many companies in this network, like Unilever, Coca-Cola, and Nestlé, source their renewable energy through off-site contracts, such as PPAs, to meet their goals.
Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi): Companies that sign onto SBTi often align their renewable energy goals with science-based carbon reduction targets, which may require sourcing significant portions of energy off-site from renewable sources.

4. Investor and Consumer Expectations

ESG Expectations: Companies under pressure from Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investors or customers may face requirements to source a percentage of their energy from renewable sources, often through off-site purchases. As investors increasingly demand more transparency and action on climate, companies are turning to off-site renewable energy solutions.
Green Bonds: Companies issuing green bonds or involved in sustainable finance may have to source off-site renewable energy to meet the criteria set by green bond standards or investor expectations.

5. Large-Scale Events

For large-scale international events like the Olympics, World Cup, or COP climate summits, off-site renewable energy procurement is often required to meet the event’s sustainability goals. Organizers may source renewable energy through contracts with wind, solar, or other renewable energy providers to power the event.

6. Carbon Neutrality and Net-Zero Targets

Many companies with long-term carbon neutrality or net-zero emissions goals set deadlines for reaching specific renewable energy milestones. This includes using off-site renewable energy to power their operations, especially when on-site renewable energy is not enough to meet demand.
For example, Microsoft has committed to being carbon-negative by 2030, meaning they will offset more carbon emissions than they generate, often by sourcing large portions of renewable energy from off-site projects.

In Summary:

The requirement for off-site renewable energy at 25%, 50%, or 75% is common in:

Regions with renewable energy mandates, such as the U.S., EU, UK, Australia, and Japan.
Corporations with sustainability and carbon neutrality goals, particularly in industries like tech, retail, and manufacturing.
Industries with sustainability certifications (e.g., RE100, SBTi).
Investors and consumers pushing for greater corporate responsibility.
Large-scale event organizers.

These requirements are generally met through off-site renewable energy contracts like PPAs and RECs, and the timing and specifics vary by region and industry.

How is Required Off Site Renewable Energy: 25%, 50%, 75%

How required off-site renewable energy is sourced at 25%, 50%, or 75% depends on the method by which organizations fulfill these renewable energy goals. Typically, businesses, governments, and other organizations use various strategies to meet these requirements, including purchasing renewable energy, signing power purchase agreements (PPAs), using renewable energy certificates (RECs), and participating in virtual power purchase agreements (VPPAs). Here’s an overview of how this works:

1. Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs)

PPAs are long-term contracts between energy buyers (such as corporations) and renewable energy producers (such as wind or solar farms). These agreements allow companies to directly buy renewable energy from off-site facilities.
- How it Works: A company agrees to purchase a specified amount of renewable energy over a defined period (typically 10-20 years) from an off-site project. The energy is generated at the renewable site and sold to the company, typically at a fixed price.
- Example: A company commits to buying 50% of its energy needs from an off-site solar farm. The energy generated by that farm is delivered to the grid, and the company receives the renewable energy credits (RECs) associated with that generation.
- Benefits: PPAs ensure a direct connection between the company and renewable energy producers. They often result in long-term financial savings and provide renewable energy projects with the capital to expand.

2. Virtual Power Purchase Agreements (VPPAs)

VPPAs are similar to traditional PPAs, but they do not involve a physical delivery of energy to the company. Instead, companies sign contracts to purchase renewable energy credits (RECs) or financial incentives from off-site renewable energy projects.
- How it Works: In a VPPA, the company agrees to purchase energy from a renewable energy project at a fixed price. However, the energy itself is typically sold to the grid, and the company receives the RECs that prove the energy was generated from renewable sources.
- Example: A company may enter into a VPPA with a wind farm in a remote location. The company pays for the renewable energy credits associated with the energy produced by the wind farm but does not physically consume the energy. The wind energy is fed into the grid for broader consumption.
- Benefits: VPPAs allow companies to support renewable energy without having to build or operate renewable energy infrastructure themselves, making them ideal for large organizations that want to reach renewable energy goals while minimizing upfront investment.

3. Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs)

RECs are tradeable certificates that represent the environmental benefits of generating electricity from renewable sources. Companies can buy RECs to prove they are supporting renewable energy projects.
- How it Works: When a renewable energy source (like a wind or solar farm) generates electricity, it produces both energy and RECs. Companies purchase these certificates to fulfill renewable energy requirements. RECs can be purchased on the open market from various renewable energy projects.
- Example: A company needs to source 50% of its energy from renewable sources. To meet this requirement, the company buys RECs equivalent to 50% of its total energy consumption, ensuring that a portion of its energy is associated with renewable generation.
- Benefits: Purchasing RECs is a flexible way for companies to meet renewable energy goals, especially when on-site generation is not feasible. RECs also provide support to renewable energy projects by enabling them to monetize their environmental benefits.

4. Community Solar and Other Local Programs

Some companies participate in community solar or similar local renewable energy programs, where they can subscribe to energy generated by solar farms or other renewable sources located off-site.
- How it Works: Instead of building their own renewable energy infrastructure, companies subscribe to a community solar program, where a local solar farm generates energy for the grid, and the company receives credits based on its share of the energy produced.
- Example: A company might participate in a local solar farm that generates energy for the grid. In exchange, the company receives renewable energy credits or offsets for a portion of its energy consumption.
- Benefits: Community solar allows companies to meet their renewable energy targets without the need for large-scale infrastructure or long-term PPAs. It’s a flexible solution for smaller organizations or those in regions where large-scale renewable energy projects are not feasible.

5. Green Energy Tariffs and Utility Programs

Many utilities offer green energy tariffs or programs that allow companies to purchase renewable energy directly from the utility provider, often from off-site sources like wind or solar farms.
- How it Works: A company signs up for a green energy plan with its utility provider, which guarantees that a portion of the energy supplied to the company will come from renewable sources.
- Example: A company in a region where the utility provider has a green tariff may purchase 50% or 75% of its energy from the utility’s renewable energy supply, which often comes from off-site projects.
- Benefits: This is a straightforward option for companies that do not want to engage in complex PPAs or VPPAs. It is easy to manage and often requires minimal investment from the company.

6. Carbon Offsets and Environmental Credits

Some companies may meet their renewable energy requirements by purchasing carbon offsets or other environmental credits that fund renewable energy projects.
- How it Works: Carbon offsets represent a reduction in greenhouse gases, such as the production of renewable energy. Companies purchase offsets to counterbalance their carbon emissions, effectively meeting sustainability targets.
- Example: A company purchases enough carbon offsets to cover 50% of its energy consumption, which includes supporting renewable energy projects.
- Benefits: This provides an indirect way to meet renewable energy requirements and helps fund renewable energy development in regions where it is not yet widespread.

7. Sustainability Certifications and Reporting

Sustainability certifications such as LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), B Corp, or ISO 14001 may require companies to demonstrate a commitment to off-site renewable energy.
- How it Works: As part of their certification process, companies may need to report their energy sourcing and prove that a certain percentage comes from renewable sources.
- Example: To qualify for a certain level of LEED certification, a company may need to source 25%-75% of its energy from off-site renewable sources, which can be achieved through RECs, PPAs, or VPPAs.
- Benefits: Achieving sustainability certifications enhances a company’s reputation and shows customers, investors, and stakeholders that it is committed to environmental stewardship.

8. Corporate Sustainability Goals and Net-Zero Targets

Net-zero or carbon-neutrality targets set by companies often require sourcing large portions of energy from off-site renewable sources to achieve emissions reductions.
- How it Works: Companies set ambitious targets, such as reducing their carbon footprint to net-zero by 2030, and they accomplish this by sourcing renewable energy from off-site facilities. They may also invest in energy efficiency measures and carbon offset programs.
- Example: A company aiming for net-zero emissions by 2030 may need to source 50% of its energy from renewable sources by 2025 and increase it to 75% or 100% by 2030.
- Benefits: Meeting net-zero targets is critical for companies that want to stay competitive, comply with international climate agreements, and reduce their environmental impact.

In Summary: How Off-Site Renewable Energy Is Sourced at 25%, 50%, and 75%

PPAs and VPPAs are the primary mechanisms for companies to source off-site renewable energy, enabling them to meet percentage targets like 25%, 50%, and 75%.
RECs, green tariffs, and community solar programs provide alternative ways for companies to claim renewable energy sourcing.
Carbon offsets and participation in sustainability certification programs can also play a role in meeting these energy targets.

The method a company uses depends on its energy needs, financial situation, and geographical location. However, the goal remains the same: to reduce dependence on fossil fuels and increase reliance on clean, renewable energy sources, ultimately supporting climate goals and sustainability objectives.

Case Study on Off Site Renewable Energy: 25%, 50%, 75%

Here’s a case study highlighting the implementation of off-site renewable energy at various levels (25%, 50%, and 75%) for a hypothetical company, GreenTech Industries, and its journey to meet its sustainability goals. This case study covers the company’s approach, challenges, and strategies at each renewable energy threshold.

Case Study: GreenTech Industries and Off-Site Renewable Energy

Company Overview:

Industry: Technology (IT services and data centers)
Headquarters: United States
Annual Energy Consumption: 100,000 MWh (megawatt-hours)
Sustainability Goal: Achieve 100% renewable energy sourcing by 2030.

GreenTech Industries has been a leader in the technology sector for over 20 years, and in recent years, the company has committed to becoming a net-zero carbon emitter by 2035. To achieve this ambitious goal, the company has set specific interim renewable energy targets, sourcing 25% renewable energy by 2025, 50% by 2027, and 75% by 2029. Here’s how the company met these targets through off-site renewable energy procurement.

1. 25% Off-Site Renewable Energy – Target for 2025

Challenge:
In 2023, GreenTech Industries set its first major renewable energy target: 25% renewable energy sourcing by 2025. At the time, the company’s energy mix was primarily from traditional power grids, which were mostly fossil-fuel-based. GreenTech recognized the need for significant change but needed to balance financial feasibility with its sustainability goals.

Strategy:
GreenTech decided to start small with renewable energy certificates (RECs) and community solar programs. They aimed to meet the 25% target with a mix of these solutions:

Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs):
- GreenTech purchased RECs to match 25% of its total energy consumption. The company sourced RECs from a variety of wind and solar projects located off-site, allowing them to claim the environmental benefits of renewable energy production.
- These RECs were sourced primarily from projects in the Midwest U.S., where wind energy is abundant.
Community Solar Program:
- GreenTech also joined a community solar program in California, where they subscribed to a local solar farm. This allowed the company to source energy from an off-site solar facility while helping to support local clean energy development.

Outcome:
By 2025, GreenTech achieved its target of 25% renewable energy. The company was able to leverage off-site renewable solutions that fit its budget and infrastructure. The company also improved its sustainability credentials, helping attract more environmentally-conscious investors and customers.

2. 50% Off-Site Renewable Energy – Target for 2027

Challenge:
As GreenTech approached its next milestone, 50% renewable energy by 2027, the company needed to scale its renewable energy procurement efforts. Simply purchasing RECs and participating in community solar programs would not suffice for the company’s growing energy needs and ambitions.

Strategy:
GreenTech moved toward power purchase agreements (PPAs) and virtual power purchase agreements (VPPAs). This shift allowed the company to support larger-scale renewable energy projects directly and secure long-term contracts for cleaner energy.

Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs):
- GreenTech signed a 10-year PPA with a solar farm in Texas, which provided a fixed-price contract for 40% of their total energy consumption. The contract was structured so that the solar farm would supply power to the grid, and GreenTech would receive the renewable energy credits (RECs) associated with that power.
- The fixed pricing of the PPA helped the company hedge against future energy price volatility.
Virtual Power Purchase Agreement (VPPA):
- To meet the remaining 10%, GreenTech entered into a VPPA with a wind farm in Nebraska. With the VPPA, GreenTech agreed to purchase renewable energy credits (RECs) from the wind farm without directly receiving the physical energy. Instead, the energy was delivered to the grid, and the company received the credits as proof of renewable energy generation.
- This deal also helped GreenTech lock in long-term prices for renewable energy, reducing exposure to fluctuating fossil fuel prices.

Outcome:
By 2027, GreenTech had successfully met its 50% renewable energy target, significantly increasing its involvement in long-term renewable energy contracts. The PPA and VPPA provided financial stability and further solidified GreenTech’s position as a leader in sustainability within the tech industry. The company was also able to leverage these agreements for branding and to meet ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) goals for investors.

3. 75% Off-Site Renewable Energy – Target for 2029

Challenge:
With a target of 75% renewable energy sourcing by 2029, GreenTech faced the challenge of scaling its energy procurement efforts once again. At this stage, the company’s energy needs had grown, and the task of achieving 75% renewable energy became more complex, requiring more substantial off-site investments.

Strategy:
To achieve this milestone, GreenTech took the following steps:

Expansion of PPAs and VPPAs:
- GreenTech expanded its PPAs with new renewable energy projects in Oklahoma and Kansas, securing an additional 25% of its energy needs. These new contracts included both solar and wind energy projects.
- GreenTech also renegotiated existing contracts to increase the percentage of energy sourced from renewables.
Increased Use of Virtual Power Purchase Agreements (VPPAs):
- In addition to the wind farm in Nebraska, GreenTech entered into another VPPA for 10% of its energy, this time with a large offshore wind project in the Northeast U.S.. The company chose offshore wind due to its ability to generate consistent power and its alignment with their future diversification goals in renewable energy.
Sustainability Partnerships:
- GreenTech partnered with local governments and utility providers in regions where they had large data centers to ensure a portion of the energy consumed by these facilities came from renewable sources. This included additional off-site wind and solar projects.

Outcome:
By 2029, GreenTech reached 75% renewable energy sourcing, a significant leap from the initial 25% target. The company’s energy mix now consisted of a combination of long-term PPAs, VPPAs, and renewable energy partnerships. This helped GreenTech reduce its reliance on traditional fossil fuel-based energy sources while continuing to lower its carbon footprint.

Key Takeaways from GreenTech Industries’ Journey:

Phased Approach:
GreenTech adopted a phased approach, starting with RECs and community solar and progressing to PPAs and VPPAs as they scaled their renewable energy sourcing. This gradual transition helped manage costs and risks while increasing the company’s renewable energy commitment over time.
Strategic Partnerships:
Forming strategic partnerships with renewable energy developers, utilities, and governments was key to meeting the company’s renewable energy targets. These partnerships provided access to larger, more cost-effective renewable energy projects.
Diversification of Energy Sources:
GreenTech utilized a mix of solar and wind energy across various regions to ensure a diversified energy portfolio. This approach reduced dependence on any single energy source and helped mitigate risks associated with regional energy supply variability.
Long-Term Contracts:
By signing long-term PPAs and VPPAs, GreenTech locked in favorable energy prices and contributed to the growth of renewable energy infrastructure. These contracts also provided financial certainty and helped the company hedge against future energy price increases.
Commitment to Net-Zero:
Reaching 75% renewable energy sourcing by 2029 brought GreenTech closer to its goal of 100% renewable energy by 2030. The company’s successful off-site renewable energy strategy played a critical role in its broader efforts toward net-zero emissions by 2035.

This case study illustrates how a company can gradually transition to off-site renewable energy by setting ambitious yet achievable targets and using various mechanisms to reach renewable energy milestones.

White paper on Off Site Renewable Energy: 25%, 50%, 75%

Achieving Renewable Energy Targets Through Off-Site Solutions (25%, 50%, 75%)

Executive Summary

As global efforts to combat climate change intensify, companies and governments are under increasing pressure to meet sustainability goals. A key part of these efforts is the adoption of renewable energy sources. However, many organizations face challenges in sourcing sufficient renewable energy, especially when on-site generation is not feasible. Off-site renewable energy offers a viable solution for organizations to meet renewable energy targets of 25%, 50%, and 75%, and in some cases, 100%.

This white paper explores how companies can meet off-site renewable energy targets through various strategies, including Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs), Virtual Power Purchase Agreements (VPPAs), Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs), Community Solar, and Green Tariffs. The paper delves into the mechanics of these strategies, the benefits they provide, and the steps organizations can take to implement them successfully.

1. Introduction

In recent years, off-site renewable energy procurement has become a central strategy for organizations looking to reduce their carbon footprint. Organizations that cannot implement on-site renewable energy generation (due to limitations in space, capital, or technology) are increasingly turning to off-site options. Off-site renewable energy allows organizations to meet ambitious renewable energy goals of 25%, 50%, and 75% by purchasing renewable energy from external sources, ensuring a clean, sustainable energy supply.

Off-site renewable energy offers a range of solutions for businesses, municipalities, and other entities, enabling them to meet their environmental goals and reduce their dependency on fossil fuels while advancing sustainability efforts.

2. Understanding Off-Site Renewable Energy

Off-site renewable energy refers to energy generated from renewable sources (e.g., wind, solar, hydropower) that is produced at locations away from where it is consumed. Unlike on-site renewable energy (where the energy is generated at the company’s facilities), off-site solutions allow companies to purchase renewable energy from external projects. The energy produced is fed into the grid, and the buyer receives Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) to verify their use of clean energy.

Several key mechanisms for sourcing off-site renewable energy include:

Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs)
Virtual Power Purchase Agreements (VPPAs)
Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs)
Community Solar Programs
Green Energy Tariffs

These mechanisms vary in structure, costs, and complexity, allowing organizations to tailor their renewable energy procurement to meet specific needs and goals.

3. Strategies for Achieving 25%, 50%, and 75% Renewable Energy Targets

3.1 Achieving 25% Off-Site Renewable Energy

For companies looking to meet 25% renewable energy by a specified target year, the following strategies can be employed:

1. Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs):

How It Works: RECs represent the environmental benefits of generating electricity from renewable sources. Companies can purchase RECs equivalent to the amount of renewable energy they wish to claim.
Example: A company consuming 100,000 MWh annually can purchase RECs for 25,000 MWh from renewable sources like wind or solar. The company may not directly use this energy but is legally entitled to claim it as renewable energy.
Benefits: This is a cost-effective, flexible solution for companies, especially those with limited space for on-site renewable installations.

2. Community Solar:

How It Works: Community solar allows companies to subscribe to local solar farms and receive a portion of the energy produced. The energy generated by the solar farm is fed into the grid, and the company is credited for its share.
Example: A company might participate in a local solar farm program that generates 25% of its annual energy consumption.
Benefits: Community solar programs are ideal for companies with limited rooftop space but a desire to contribute to local renewable energy development.

3. Green Energy Tariffs:

How It Works: Many utilities offer green energy tariffs, which allow customers to purchase renewable energy directly from the utility. The utility procures renewable energy from off-site sources on behalf of the customer.
Example: A company in a region where the utility offers a green tariff can opt into the program and receive 25% of its energy from renewable sources.
Benefits: This is a straightforward option for companies looking to meet a small renewable energy target without significant upfront investment.

3.2 Achieving 50% Off-Site Renewable Energy

As companies aim for a 50% renewable energy target, they will likely need to explore more substantial renewable energy procurement mechanisms such as Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) and Virtual Power Purchase Agreements (VPPAs).

1. Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs):

How It Works: A PPA is a long-term contract between a buyer (e.g., a company) and a renewable energy producer (e.g., a solar or wind farm). The buyer agrees to purchase a set amount of renewable energy at a fixed price, usually over 10-20 years.
Example: A company signs a PPA with a solar farm that generates 50% of its energy needs. The energy produced by the farm is fed into the grid, and the company receives the associated RECs.
Benefits: PPAs provide long-term price stability and help ensure the financial viability of renewable energy projects.

2. Virtual Power Purchase Agreements (VPPAs):

How It Works: A VPPA is similar to a PPA, but the company does not receive the physical energy. Instead, the company purchases the renewable energy certificates (RECs) from the off-site renewable project.
Example: A company signs a VPPA with an offshore wind farm that generates 50% of its energy needs. The company does not receive the energy directly but purchases RECs corresponding to the wind farm’s output.
Benefits: VPPAs are a more flexible and scalable option for larger energy consumers, allowing them to meet renewable energy goals without taking on the complexities of managing the physical energy delivery.

3.3 Achieving 75% Off-Site Renewable Energy

To meet 75% renewable energy goals, companies need to significantly scale up their renewable energy purchases, often requiring a combination of PPAs, VPPAs, and potentially participation in large-scale renewable energy projects.

1. Expanding PPAs and VPPAs:

How It Works: As the company’s renewable energy needs grow, it will likely need to enter into additional PPAs or VPPAs, increasing the share of its energy sourced from renewable projects.
Example: A company that previously signed PPAs for 50% of its energy might negotiate additional contracts to cover an additional 25% from a new solar farm or wind project.
Benefits: Expanding PPAs and VPPAs ensures that the company continues to support large-scale renewable energy projects and stabilizes its energy costs.

2. Renewable Energy Partnerships:

How It Works: Partnerships with local governments, utilities, and energy providers can help companies access additional renewable energy sources, particularly when large-scale renewable energy projects are needed.
Example: A company may collaborate with a regional utility to develop additional renewable energy infrastructure or access new wind and solar power projects.
Benefits: Partnerships can provide access to cost-effective renewable energy and allow companies to participate in local clean energy development initiatives.

4. Benefits of Off-Site Renewable Energy Solutions

Off-site renewable energy solutions offer numerous benefits to companies, including:

Cost Savings: Off-site renewable energy often provides predictable and lower energy costs, especially with long-term contracts like PPAs and VPPAs.
Scalability: Companies can scale their renewable energy procurement over time to meet increasing energy demand and sustainability targets.
Risk Mitigation: Off-site solutions like PPAs and VPPAs can protect companies from energy price volatility by locking in fixed prices over long periods.
Environmental Impact: Sourcing renewable energy reduces greenhouse gas emissions, helping companies meet net-zero and other climate-related commitments.
Brand Image: Companies that adopt off-site renewable energy solutions enhance their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) credentials, improving their appeal to investors, customers, and employees.

5. Conclusion

Achieving renewable energy targets of 25%, 50%, and 75% through off-site solutions is a realistic and effective strategy for organizations committed to reducing their carbon footprint and supporting the global transition to clean energy. By leveraging PPAs, VPPAs, RECs, and community solar programs, companies can meet their sustainability goals while mitigating the environmental impact of their operations.

For organizations seeking to reach higher renewable energy targets, the combination of various off-site mechanisms allows for flexibility, scalability, and long-term cost stability, ultimately contributing to a cleaner, more sustainable energy future.

References

International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA)
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
Renewable Energy Buyers Alliance (REBA)
Clean Energy Buyers Association (CEBA)

This white paper provides insights into how businesses and other entities can use off-site renewable energy solutions to meet progressively higher renewable energy targets and play a vital role in global sustainability efforts.

Industrial Application of Off Site Renewable Energy: 25%, 50%, 75%

Courtesy: EcoMastery Project

Executive Summary

As industries across the globe strive to reduce their carbon footprints and comply with evolving environmental regulations, the adoption of off-site renewable energy is becoming a key strategy. Off-site renewable energy refers to sourcing renewable energy from external projects—such as solar, wind, and hydro—that are not located at the consuming company’s site but are linked to the grid. This white paper explores how industrial companies can implement off-site renewable energy at 25%, 50%, and 75% levels, detailing practical applications, benefits, and challenges for each milestone.

1. Introduction

The industrial sector is one of the largest consumers of energy worldwide, and it is also a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. Transitioning to renewable energy is essential for meeting sustainability goals, reducing costs, and complying with both government mandates and consumer expectations for environmental responsibility. While on-site renewable energy installations (such as rooftop solar and wind turbines) may not always be feasible, off-site renewable energy offers an alternative solution for industries to meet renewable energy targets.

Off-site renewable energy enables industries to source clean energy from remote solar, wind, or hydropower facilities through mechanisms like Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs), Virtual Power Purchase Agreements (VPPAs), and Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs). These mechanisms allow companies to meet renewable energy targets of 25%, 50%, and 75% through various off-site options, while contributing to their broader environmental, social, and governance (ESG) goals.

2. Off-Site Renewable Energy Strategies in Industry

Industries can approach off-site renewable energy procurement in a number of ways, depending on their size, energy requirements, and sustainability targets. Key off-site renewable energy strategies include:

Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs): Long-term contracts between an energy buyer and a renewable energy provider.
Virtual Power Purchase Agreements (VPPAs): Similar to PPAs, but the company does not directly consume the energy; instead, it purchases the renewable energy certificates (RECs) from the off-site generation project.
Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs): Certificates purchased from renewable energy projects, allowing a company to claim renewable energy consumption without taking direct delivery of the energy.
Community Solar Programs: Industrial companies can subscribe to local solar farms, which feed energy into the grid and provide the company with credits for the energy they use.
Green Energy Tariffs: Utilities offer green energy tariffs, where customers pay a premium for energy sourced from renewable projects.

Each of these strategies can be employed in varying degrees to meet 25%, 50%, and 75% renewable energy targets, as described below.

3. Industrial Application of Off-Site Renewable Energy

3.1 Achieving 25% Renewable Energy: Initial Commitment and Scalability

Target: 25% Renewable Energy
At the 25% renewable energy target, industrial companies typically begin their transition toward sustainable energy by sourcing part of their energy from off-site renewable sources. This level often marks an organization’s first significant step in reducing its carbon footprint and meeting sustainability goals.

Key Strategies:

Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs):
- Application: The simplest and most flexible way for an industrial company to achieve its 25% renewable energy target is by purchasing RECs that correspond to 25% of their annual energy consumption.
- Example: A manufacturing plant consuming 200,000 MWh of energy annually can purchase RECs equivalent to 50,000 MWh from renewable sources like wind or solar. The company can then claim that 25% of its energy is renewable.
Community Solar:
- Application: If the company operates in a region with community solar programs, it can subscribe to a local solar farm and claim a portion of the solar energy produced.
- Example: A company operating a regional distribution center subscribes to a community solar farm and receives 25% of its energy from that project.
Green Energy Tariffs:
- Application: Many utilities offer green energy tariffs that allow industrial customers to pay a premium for renewable energy sourced from off-site projects.
- Example: A company enters into a green energy tariff with its local utility and receives 25% of its energy from renewable sources.

Benefits:

Flexibility: These solutions allow industries to start small and scale up their renewable energy procurement over time.
Cost-Effectiveness: RECs and community solar programs are generally cost-effective options for achieving 25% renewable energy.
Easy to Implement: These solutions are relatively simple to implement with minimal capital expenditure.

3.2 Achieving 50% Renewable Energy: Scaling Up

Target: 50% Renewable Energy
At the 50% renewable energy target, industrial companies begin to scale up their renewable energy sourcing, often transitioning to more structured agreements like PPAs or VPPAs. The goal at this level is to significantly increase the amount of renewable energy purchased while mitigating price volatility and ensuring a stable, long-term energy supply.

Key Strategies:

Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs):
- Application: Companies can enter into long-term PPAs with renewable energy developers to secure energy from solar, wind, or other renewable sources. A PPA locks in energy prices over 10-20 years, providing price certainty and reducing exposure to fossil fuel price volatility.
- Example: A large industrial facility enters into a 15-year PPA with a wind farm, securing 50% of its energy needs from the project.
Virtual Power Purchase Agreements (VPPAs):
- Application: With a VPPA, companies can support renewable energy projects without directly receiving the energy. Instead, the company buys the RECs associated with the energy generated from the renewable project.
- Example: An industrial company signs a VPPA with a solar farm, purchasing RECs equivalent to 50% of its energy needs while benefiting from the financial stability of a long-term renewable energy contract.
Expanded Community Solar Programs:
- Application: Companies can expand their participation in community solar projects, subscribing to multiple solar farms or increasing their share in existing projects.
- Example: A manufacturing company that initially subscribed to a community solar project for 25% of its energy increases its subscription to cover 50% of its energy consumption.

Benefits:

Cost Predictability: PPAs and VPPAs provide long-term pricing stability, helping to hedge against rising fossil fuel costs.
Scalability: These agreements are more scalable than RECs or community solar, allowing companies to gradually increase their renewable energy procurement.
Environmental Impact: Transitioning to 50% renewable energy significantly reduces an industrial company’s carbon footprint.

3.3 Achieving 75% Renewable Energy: Full Integration

Target: 75% Renewable Energy
At the 75% renewable energy target, companies will likely be deeply integrated into the renewable energy market. Achieving this target requires additional long-term contracts and the development of more strategic, large-scale renewable energy initiatives.

Key Strategies:

Expanded PPAs and VPPAs:
- Application: To reach 75%, industrial companies need to sign multiple PPAs or VPPAs to cover a larger share of their energy needs, often involving projects in diverse geographical regions to ensure a stable energy supply.
- Example: A large industrial conglomerate signs several PPAs with multiple solar and wind farms in different regions, securing 75% of its energy from renewable sources.
Energy Storage Solutions:
- Application: To mitigate the intermittency of renewable energy (e.g., solar and wind power), some companies integrate energy storage solutions into their renewable energy procurement strategies. This ensures a consistent power supply when renewable generation is low.
- Example: A company that has signed multiple PPAs for wind and solar energy installs large-scale battery storage systems to ensure that 75% of its energy is reliably sourced from renewables.
Renewable Energy Partnerships:
- Application: Companies may partner with energy providers or local governments to co-develop new renewable energy projects, or to access larger-scale renewable energy infrastructure.
- Example: A company partners with a utility to build a large wind farm, supplying 75% of its energy needs from the project.

Benefits:

Diversified Energy Portfolio: Companies can source renewable energy from multiple regions and technologies (e.g., wind, solar, hydro) to reduce risk and ensure a reliable energy supply.
Long-Term Sustainability: At 75% renewable energy, companies are well on their way to meeting sustainability and net-zero targets.
Corporate Reputation: Achieving 75% renewable energy sourcing demonstrates a strong commitment to sustainability, enhancing the company’s reputation with stakeholders, investors, and consumers.

4. Conclusion

The industrial application of off-site renewable energy at 25%, 50%, and 75% is an effective way for companies to reduce their carbon footprint, mitigate energy price volatility, and meet global sustainability goals. By leveraging strategies such as PPAs, VPPAs, RECs, and community solar, industries can make significant strides in their renewable energy adoption while maintaining operational flexibility and financial stability.

As industries move towards higher renewable energy targets, the need for scalable, cost-effective solutions becomes even more important. Through careful planning, strategic partnerships, and long-term investments in renewable energy, companies can achieve 100% renewable energy sourcing, further solidifying their commitment to a sustainable future.

References

International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA)
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
Clean Energy Buyers Association (CEBA)
Renewable Energy Buyers Alliance (REBA)

This white paper provides a framework for industrial companies looking to implement off-site renewable energy solutions to meet their renewable energy goals at varying levels.

References

^ Armaroli, Nicola; Balzani, Vincenzo (2011). “Towards an electricity-powered world”. Energy and Environmental Science. 4 (9): 3193–3222. doi:10.1039/c1ee01249e. ISSN 1754-5692.
^ Armaroli, Nicola; Balzani, Vincenzo (2016). “Solar Electricity and Solar Fuels: Status and Perspectives in the Context of the Energy Transition”. Chemistry – A European Journal. 22 (1): 32–57. doi:10.1002/chem.201503580. PMID 26584653.
^ “Global renewable energy trends”. Deloitte Insights. Archived from the original on 29 January 2019. Retrieved 28 January 2019.
^ “Renewable Energy Now Accounts for a Third of Global Power Capacity”. irena.org. 2 April 2019. Archived from the original on 2 April 2019. Retrieved 2 December 2020.
^ “2023 Levelized Cost Of Energy+”. www.lazard.com. Retrieved 10 June 2024.
^ IEA (2020). Renewables 2020 Analysis and forecast to 2025 (Report). p. 12. Archived from the original on 26 April 2021. Retrieved 27 April 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Renewables 2022”. Global Status Report (renewable energies): 44. 14 June 2019. Retrieved 5 September 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Share of electricity production from renewables”. Our World in Data. 2023. Retrieved 15 August 2023.
^ “Renewables – Energy System”. IEA. Retrieved 23 May 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max; Rosado, Pablo (January 2024). “Renewable Energy”. Our World in Data.
^ Sensiba, Jennifer (28 October 2021). “Some Good News: 10 Countries Generate Almost 100% Renewable Electricity”. CleanTechnica. Archived from the original on 17 November 2021. Retrieved 22 November 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j Ehrlich, Robert; Geller, Harold A.; Geller, Harold (2018). Renewable energy: a first course (2nd ed.). Boca Raton London New York: Taylor & Francis, CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-138-29738-8.
^ “Rapid rollout of clean technologies makes energy cheaper, not more costly”. International Energy Agency. 30 May 2024. Retrieved 31 May 2024.
^ Timperley, Jocelyn (20 October 2021). “Why fossil fuel subsidies are so hard to kill”. Nature. 598 (7881): 403–405. Bibcode:2021Natur.598..403T. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-02847-2. PMID 34671143. S2CID 239052649.
^ Lockwood, Matthew; Mitchell, Catherine; Hoggett, Richard (May 2020). “Incumbent lobbying as a barrier to forward-looking regulation: The case of demand-side response in the GB capacity market for electricity”. Energy Policy. 140: 111426. Bibcode:2020EnPol.14011426L. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111426.
^ Susskind, Lawrence; Chun, Jungwoo; Gant, Alexander; Hodgkins, Chelsea; Cohen, Jessica; Lohmar, Sarah (June 2022). “Sources of opposition to renewable energy projects in the United States”. Energy Policy. 165: 112922. Bibcode:2022EnPol.16512922S. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112922.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Net Zero by 2050 – Analysis”. IEA. 18 May 2021. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
^ Isaacs-Thomas, Bella (1 December 2023). “Mining is necessary for the green transition. Here’s why experts say we need to do it better”. PBS NewsHour. Retrieved 31 May 2024.
^ “Electricity production by source, World”. Our World in Data, crediting Ember. Archived from the original on 1 December 2024. OWID credits “Source: Ember’s Yearly Electricity Data; Ember’s European Electricity Review; Energy Institute Statistical Review of World Energy”.
^ Friedlingstein, Pierre; Jones, Matthew W.; O’Sullivan, Michael; Andrew, Robbie M.; Hauck, Judith; Peters, Glen P.; Peters, Wouter; Pongratz, Julia; Sitch, Stephen; Le Quéré, Corinne; Bakker, Dorothee C. E. (2019). “Global Carbon Budget 2019”. Earth System Science Data. 11 (4): 1783–1838. Bibcode:2019ESSD…11.1783F. doi:10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019. hdl:20.500.11850/385668. ISSN 1866-3508. Archived from the original on 6 May 2021. Retrieved 15 February 2021.
^ Harjanne, Atte; Korhonen, Janne M. (April 2019). “Abandoning the concept of renewable energy”. Energy Policy. 127: 330–340. Bibcode:2019EnPol.127..330H. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.029.
^ REN21 Renewables Global Status Report 2010.
^ Kutscher, Charles F.; Milford, Jana B.; Kreith, Frank (2019). Principles of sustainable energy systems. Mechanical and aerospace engineering (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 978-1-4987-8892-2.
^ Srouji, Jamal; Fransen, Taryn; Boehm, Sophie; Waskow, David; Carter, Rebecca; Larsen, Gaia (25 April 2024). “Next-generation Climate Targets: A 5-Point Plan for NDCs”. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Suzuki, Masahiro; Jewell, Jessica; Cherp, Aleh (9 November 2023). “Have climate policies accelerated energy transitions? Historical evolution of electricity mix in the G7 and the EU compared to net-zero targets”. Energy Research & Social Science. 106: 103281. Bibcode:2023ERSS..10603281S. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2023.103281. hdl:20.500.14018/14250.
^ “COP28: New deals and evasive tactics”. The economist. 19 December 2023. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
^ Abnett, Kate (20 April 2022). “European Commission analysing higher 45% renewable energy target for 2030”. Reuters. Retrieved 29 April 2022.
^ Overland, Indra; Juraev, Javlon; Vakulchuk, Roman (1 November 2022). “Are renewable energy sources more evenly distributed than fossil fuels?”. Renewable Energy. 200: 379–386. Bibcode:2022REne..200..379O. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.09.046. hdl:11250/3033797. ISSN 0960-1481.
^ Scovronick, Noah; Budolfson, Mark; Dennig, Francis; Errickson, Frank; Fleurbaey, Marc; Peng, Wei; Socolow, Robert H.; Spears, Dean; Wagner, Fabian (7 May 2019). “The impact of human health co-benefits on evaluations of global climate policy”. Nature Communications. 10 (1): 2095. Bibcode:2019NatCo..10.2095S. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09499-x. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 6504956. PMID 31064982.
^ Wan, Y. H. (January 2012). Long-term wind power variability (PDF). National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
^ Olauson, Jon; Ayob, Mohd Nasir; Bergkvist, Mikael; Carpman, Nicole; Castellucci, Valeria; Goude, Anders; Lingfors, David; Waters, Rafael; Widén, Joakim (December 2016). “Net load variability in Nordic countries with a highly or fully renewable power system”. Nature Energy. 1 (12): 16175. Bibcode:2016NatEn…116175O. doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.175. ISSN 2058-7546. S2CID 113848337. Archived from the original on 4 October 2021. Retrieved 4 October 2021.
^ Swartz, Kristi E. (8 December 2021). “Can U.S. phase out natural gas? Lessons from the Southeast”. E&E News. Retrieved 2 May 2022.
^ “Climate change: phase out gas power by 2035, say businesses including Nestle, Thames Water, Co-op”. Sky News. Retrieved 2 May 2022.
^ Roberts, David (30 November 2018). “Clean energy technologies threaten to overwhelm the grid. Here’s how it can adapt”. Vox. Retrieved 20 April 2024.
^ “AI and other tricks are bringing power lines into the 21st century”. The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 12 May 2024.
^ Ramsebner, Jasmine; Haas, Reinhard; Ajanovic, Amela; Wietschel, Martin (July 2021). “The sector coupling concept: A critical review”. WIREs Energy and Environment. 10 (4). Bibcode:2021WIREE..10E.396R. doi:10.1002/wene.396. ISSN 2041-8396. S2CID 234026069.
^ “4 questions on sector coupling”. Wartsila.com. Retrieved 15 May 2022.
^ “Intelligent, flexible Sector Coupling in cities can double the potential for Wind and Solar”. Energy Post. 16 December 2021. Archived from the original on 27 May 2022. Retrieved 15 May 2022.
^ IEA (2020). World Energy Outlook 2020. International Energy Agency. p. 109. ISBN 978-92-64-44923-7. Archived from the original on 22 August 2021.
^ “Hydropower Special Market Report – Analysis”. IEA. 30 June 2021. Retrieved 31 January 2022.
^ “What role is large-scale battery storage playing on the grid today?”. Energy Storage News. 5 May 2022. Retrieved 9 May 2022.
^ Zhou, Chen; Liu, Rao; Ba, Yu; Wang, Haixia; Ju, Rongbin; Song, Minggang; Zou, Nan; Li, Weidong (28 May 2021). “Study on the optimization of the day-ahead addition space for large-scale energy storage participation in auxiliary services”. 2021 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems. ICAIIS 2021. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 1–6. doi:10.1145/3469213.3471362. ISBN 978-1-4503-9020-0. S2CID 237206056.
^ Heilweil, Rebecca (5 May 2022). “These batteries work from home”. Vox. Retrieved 9 May 2022.
^ Schrotenboer, Albert H.; Veenstra, Arjen A.T.; uit het Broek, Michiel A.J.; Ursavas, Evrim (October 2022). “A Green Hydrogen Energy System: Optimal control strategies for integrated hydrogen storage and power generation with wind energy” (PDF). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 168: 112744. arXiv:2108.00530. Bibcode:2022RSERv.16812744S. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112744. S2CID 250941369.
^ Lipták, Béla (24 January 2022). “Hydrogen is key to sustainable green energy”. Control. Retrieved 12 February 2023.
^ Gordon, Samuel; McGarry, Connor; Bell, Keith (2022). “The growth of distributed generation and associated challenges: A Great Britain case study”. IET Renewable Power Generation. 16 (9): 1827–1840. Bibcode:2022IRPG…16.1827G. doi:10.1049/rpg2.12416. ISSN 1752-1424.
^ O’Sullivan, Alexander Lipke, Janka Oertel, Daniel (29 May 2024). “Trust and trade-offs: How to manage Europe’s green technology dependence on China”. ECFR. Retrieved 12 December 2024.
^ “Hacking Rooftop Solar Is a Way to Break Europe’s Power Grid”. Bloomberg.com. 12 December 2024. Retrieved 12 December 2024.
^ “The gigantic and unregulated power plants in the cloud”. Bert Hubert’s writings. 19 August 2024. Retrieved 12 December 2024.
^ Tam, Kimberly (5 September 2024). “How cyberattacks on offshore wind farms could create huge problems”. The Conversation. Retrieved 12 December 2024.
^ “SolarPower Europe calls for stronger cybersecurity measures”. pv magazine International. 12 July 2024. Retrieved 12 December 2024.
^ Source for data beginning in 2017: “Renewable Energy Market Update Outlook for 2023 and 2024” (PDF). IEA.org. International Energy Agency (IEA). June 2023. p. 19. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 July 2023. IEA. CC BY 4.0. ● Source for data through 2016: “Renewable Energy Market Update / Outlook for 2021 and 2022” (PDF). IEA.org. International Energy Agency. May 2021. p. 8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 March 2023. IEA. Licence: CC BY 4.0
^ IRENA 2024, p. 21.
^ IRENA 2024, p. 21. Note: Compound annual growth rate 2014-2023.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d “Global Electricity Review 2024”. Ember. 8 May 2024. Retrieved 8 May 2024.
^ NREL ATB 2021, Utility-Scale PV.
^ “Data Page: Share of electricity generated by solar power”. Our World in Data. 2023.
^ “Renewable Energy”. Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. 27 October 2021. Archived from the original on 18 November 2021. Retrieved 22 November 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Weiss, Werner; Spörk-Dür, Monika (2023). Solar heat worldwide (PDF). International Energy Agency. p. 12.
^ “Solar – Fuels & Technologies”. IEA. Retrieved 27 June 2022.
^ Zaręba, Anna; Krzemińska, Alicja; Kozik, Renata; Adynkiewicz-Piragas, Mariusz; Kristiánová, Katarina (17 March 2022). “Passive and Active Solar Systems in Eco-Architecture and Eco-Urban Planning”. Applied Sciences. 12 (6): 3095. doi:10.3390/app12063095. ISSN 2076-3417.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d “Global landscape of renewable energy finance 2023” (PDF). International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). February 2023. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 March 2024. Retrieved 21 March 2024.
^ “Solar (photovoltaic) panel prices vs. cumulative capacity”. OurWorldInData.org. 2023. Archived from the original on 29 September 2023. OWID credits source data to: Nemet (2009); Farmer & Lafond (2016); International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA).
^ “Swanson’s Law and Making US Solar Scale Like Germany”. Greentech Media. 24 November 2014.
^ “Energy Sources: Solar”. Department of Energy. Archived from the original on 14 April 2011. Retrieved 19 April 2011.
^ “Solar Integrated in New Jersey”. Jcwinnie.biz. Archived from the original on 19 July 2013. Retrieved 20 August 2013.
^ “Getting the most out of tomorrow’s grid requires digitisation and demand response”. The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 24 June 2022.
^ “The History of Solar” (PDF). U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved 7 April 2024.
^ Lee, Patrick (12 January 1990). “Arco Sells Last 3 Solar Plants for $2 Million : Energy: The sale to New Mexico investors demonstrates the firm’s strategy of focusing on its core oil and gas business”. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 7 April 2024.
^ “Crossing the Chasm” (PDF). Deutsche Bank Markets Research. 27 February 2015. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 March 2015.
^ Ravishankar, Rashmi; AlMahmoud, Elaf; Habib, Abdulelah; de Weck, Olivier L. (January 2022). “Capacity Estimation of Solar Farms Using Deep Learning on High-Resolution Satellite Imagery”. Remote Sensing. 15 (1): 210. Bibcode:2022RemS…15..210R. doi:10.3390/rs15010210. hdl:1721.1/146994. ISSN 2072-4292.
^ “Renewable Electricity Capacity And Generation Statistics June 2018”. Archived from the original on 28 November 2018. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c IEA (2022), Renewables 2022, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2022, License: CC BY 4.0
^ Ahmad, Mariam (30 May 2023). “Top 10: Largest Solar Power Parks”. energydigital.com. Retrieved 7 April 2024.
^ Coren, Michael (13 February 2024). “Meet the other solar panel”. The Washington Post.
^ Kingsley, Patrick; Elkayam, Amit (9 October 2022). “‘Eye of Sauron’: The Dazzling Solar Tower in the Israeli Desert”. The New York Times.
^ “Wind energy generation by region”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 10 March 2020. Retrieved 15 August 2023.
^ IRENA 2024, p. 14.
^ IRENA 2024, p. 14. Note: Compound annual growth rate 2014-2023.
^ NREL ATB 2021, Land-Based Wind.
^ “Analysis of Wind Energy in the EU-25” (PDF). European Wind Energy Association. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 March 2007. Retrieved 11 March 2007.
^ “Electricity – from other renewable sources – The World Factbook”. www.cia.gov. Archived from the original on 27 October 2021. Retrieved 27 October 2021.
^ “Offshore stations experience mean wind speeds at 80 m that are 90% greater than over land on average.” Evaluation of global wind power Archived 25 May 2008 at the Wayback Machine “Overall, the researchers calculated winds at 80 meters [300 feet] above sea level traveled over the ocean at approximately 8.6 meters per second and at nearly 4.5 meters per second over land [20 and 10 miles per hour, respectively].” Global Wind Map Shows Best Wind Farm Locations Archived 24 May 2005 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 30 January 2006.
^ IRENA 2024, p. 9. Note: Excludes pure pumped storage.
^ IRENA 2024, p. 9. Note: Excludes pure pumped storage. Compound annual growth rate 2014-2023.
^ NREL ATB 2021, Hydropower.
^ Ang, Tze-Zhang; Salem, Mohamed; Kamarol, Mohamad; Das, Himadry Shekhar; Nazari, Mohammad Alhuyi; Prabaharan, Natarajan (2022). “A comprehensive study of renewable energy sources: Classifications, challenges and suggestions”. Energy Strategy Reviews. 43: 100939. Bibcode:2022EneSR..4300939A. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2022.100939. ISSN 2211-467X. S2CID 251889236.
^ Moran, Emilio F.; Lopez, Maria Claudia; Moore, Nathan; Müller, Norbert; Hyndman, David W. (2018). “Sustainable hydropower in the 21st century”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115 (47): 11891–11898. Bibcode:2018PNAS..11511891M. doi:10.1073/pnas.1809426115. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 6255148. PMID 30397145.
^ “DocHdl2OnPN-PRINTRDY-01tmpTarget” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 November 2018. Retrieved 26 March 2019.
^ Afework, Bethel (3 September 2018). “Run-of-the-river hydroelectricity”. Energy Education. Archived from the original on 27 April 2019. Retrieved 27 April 2019.
^ “Net zero: International Hydropower Association”. www.hydropower.org. Retrieved 24 June 2022.
^ “Hydropower Status Report”. International Hydropower Association. 11 June 2021. Archived from the original on 3 April 2023. Retrieved 30 May 2022.
^ Energy Technology Perspectives: Scenarios and Strategies to 2050. Paris: International Energy Agency. 2006. p. 124. ISBN 926410982X. Retrieved 30 May 2022.
^ “Environmental Impacts of Hydroelectric Power | Union of Concerned Scientists”. www.ucsusa.org. Archived from the original on 15 July 2021. Retrieved 9 July 2021.
^ “Hydropower Special Market Report” (PDF). IEA. pp. 34–36. Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 July 2021. Retrieved 9 July 2021.
^ L. Lia; T. Jensen; K.E. Stensbyand; G. Holm; A.M. Ruud. “The current status of hydropower development and dam construction in Norway” (PDF). Ntnu.no. Archived from the original on 25 May 2017. Retrieved 26 March 2019.
^ “How Norway became Europe’s biggest power exporter”. Power Technology. 19 April 2021. Archived from the original on 27 June 2022. Retrieved 27 June 2022.
^ “Trade surplus soars on energy exports | Norway’s News in English — www.newsinenglish.no”. 17 January 2022. Retrieved 27 June 2022.
^ “New Transmission Line Reaches Milestone”. Vpr.net. Archived from the original on 3 February 2017. Retrieved 3 February 2017.
^ IRENA 2024, p. 30.
^ IRENA 2024, p. 30. Note: Compound annual growth rate 2014-2023.
^ NREL ATB 2021, Other Technologies (EIA).
^ Scheck, Justin; Dugan, Ianthe Jeanne (23 July 2012). “Wood-Fired Plants Generate Violations”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 25 July 2021. Retrieved 18 July 2021.
^ “FAQs • What is woody biomass, and where does it come from?”. Placer County Government. Retrieved 5 May 2024.
^ Pelkmans, Luc (November 2021). IEA Bioenergy Countries’ Report: Implementation of bioenergy in the IEA Bioenergy member countries (PDF). International Energy Agency. p. 10. ISBN 978-1-910154-93-9.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Loyola, Mario (23 November 2019). “Stop the Ethanol Madness”. The Atlantic. Retrieved 5 May 2024.
^ UK, Maria Mellor, WIRED. “Biofuels are meant to clean up flying’s carbon crisis. They won’t”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 5 May 2024.
^ Timperly, Jocelyn (23 February 2017). “Biomass subsidies ‘not fit for purpose’, says Chatham House”. Carbon Brief Ltd © 2020 – Company No. 07222041. Archived from the original on 6 November 2020. Retrieved 31 October 2020.
^ “Biofuels”. International Energy Agency. Retrieved 5 May 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b REN21 Renewables Global Status Report 2011, pp. 13–14.
^ “Japan to create bio jet fuel supply chain in clean energy push”. Nikkei Asia. Retrieved 26 April 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Martin, Jeremy (22 June 2016). “Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Biodiesel (Charts and Graphs Included!)”. The Equation. Retrieved 5 May 2024.
^ “Energy crops”. crops are grown specifically for use as fuel. BIOMASS Energy Centre. Archived from the original on 10 March 2013. Retrieved 6 April 2013.
^ Liu, Xinyu; Kwon, Hoyoung; Wang, Michael; O’Connor, Don (15 August 2023). “Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Brazilian Sugar Cane Ethanol Evaluated with the GREET Model Using Data Submitted to RenovaBio”. Environmental Science & Technology. 57 (32): 11814–11822. Bibcode:2023EnST…5711814L. doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c08488. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 10433513. PMID 37527415.
^ “Biofuels”. OECD Library. 2022. Retrieved 5 May 2024.
^ Qin, Zhangcai; Zhuang, Qianlai; Cai, Ximing; He, Yujie; Huang, Yao; Jiang, Dong; Lin, Erda; Liu, Yaling; Tang, Ya; Wang, Michael Q. (February 2018). “Biomass and biofuels in China: Toward bioenergy resource potentials and their impacts on the environment”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 82: 2387–2400. Bibcode:2018RSERv..82.2387Q. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.073.
^ Kramer, David (1 July 2022). “Whatever happened to cellulosic ethanol?”. Physics Today. 75 (7): 22–24. Bibcode:2022PhT….75g..22K. doi:10.1063/PT.3.5036. ISSN 0031-9228.
^ Ahmad Dar, Rouf; Ahmad Dar, Eajaz; Kaur, Ajit; Gupta Phutela, Urmila (1 February 2018). “Sweet sorghum-a promising alternative feedstock for biofuel production”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 82: 4070–4090. Bibcode:2018RSERv..82.4070A. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.066. ISSN 1364-0321.
^ Howard, Brian (28 January 2020). “Turning cow waste into clean power on a national scale”. The Hill. Archived from the original on 29 January 2020. Retrieved 30 January 2020.
^ Zhu, Liandong; Li, Zhaohua; Hiltunen, Erkki (28 June 2018). “Microalgae Chlorella vulgaris biomass harvesting by natural flocculant: effects on biomass sedimentation, spent medium recycling and lipid extraction”. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 11 (1): 183. Bibcode:2018BB…..11..183Z. doi:10.1186/s13068-018-1183-z. eISSN 1754-6834. PMC 6022341. PMID 29988300.
^ IRENA 2024, p. 43.
^ IRENA 2024, p. 43. Note: Compound annual growth rate 2014-2023.
^ “Electricity”. International Energy Agency. 2020. Data Browser section, Electricity Generation by Source indicator. Archived from the original on 7 June 2021. Retrieved 17 July 2021.
^ NREL ATB 2021, Geothermal.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Clauser, Christoph (2024), “Earth’s Heat and Temperature Field”, Introduction to Geophysics, Springer Textbooks in Earth Sciences, Geography and Environment, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 247–325, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-17867-2_6, ISBN 978-3-031-17866-5, retrieved 6 May 2024
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Dincer, Ibrahim; Ezzat, Muhammad F. (2018), “3.6 Geothermal Energy Production”, Comprehensive Energy Systems, Elsevier, pp. 252–303, doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809597-3.00313-8, ISBN 978-0-12-814925-6, retrieved 7 May 2024
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Ritchie, Hannah; Rosado, Pablo; Roser, Max (2023). “Data Page: Geothermal energy capacity”. Our World in Data. Retrieved 7 May 2024.
^ “Electricity generation, capacity, and sales in the United States”. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Retrieved 7 May 2024.
^ “Use of geothermal energy”. U.S. Energy Information Administration. 22 November 2023. Retrieved 7 May 2024.
^ Hussain, Akhtar; Arif, Syed Muhammad; Aslam, Muhammad (2017). “Emerging renewable and sustainable energy technologies: State of the art”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 71: 12–28. Bibcode:2017RSERv..71…12H. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.033.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b International Energy Agency (2007). Renewables in global energy supply: An IEA facts sheet (PDF), OECD, p. 3. Archived 12 October 2009 at the Wayback Machine
^ Duchane, Dave; Brown, Don (December 2002). “Hot Dry Rock (HDR) Geothermal Energy Research and Development at Fenton Hill, New Mexico” (PDF). Geo-Heat Centre Quarterly Bulletin. Vol. 23, no. 4. Klamath Falls, Oregon: Oregon Institute of Technology. pp. 13–19. ISSN 0276-1084. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 June 2010. Retrieved 5 May 2009.
^ Stober, Ingrid; Bucher, Kurt (2021), “Enhanced-Geothermal-Systems (EGS), Hot-Dry-Rock Systems (HDR), Deep-Heat-Mining (DHM)”, Geothermal Energy, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 205–225, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-71685-1_9, ISBN 978-3-030-71684-4
^ “Australia’s Renewable Energy Future inc Cooper Basin & geothermal map of Australia Retrieved 15 August 2015” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 March 2015.
^ Archer, Rosalind (2020), “Geothermal Energy”, Future Energy, Elsevier, pp. 431–445, doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-102886-5.00020-7, ISBN 978-0-08-102886-5, retrieved 9 May 2024
^ Innovation Outlook: Ocean Energy Technologies (PDF). Abu Dabi: International Renewable Energy Agency. 2020. pp. 51–52. ISBN 978-92-9260-287-1. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 March 2024.
^ Gao, Zhen; Bingham, Harry B.; Ingram, David; Kolios, Athanasios; Karmakar, Debabrata; Utsunomiya, Tomoaki; Catipovic, Ivan; Colicchio, Giuseppina; Rodrigues, Jos&#233 (2018), “Committee V.4: Offshore Renewable Energy”, Proceedings of the 20th International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress (ISSC 2018) Volume 2, IOS Press, p. 253, doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-864-8-193, retrieved 9 May 2024
^ Park, Eun Soo; Lee, Tai Sik (November 2021). “The rebirth and eco-friendly energy production of an artificial lake: A case study on the tidal power in South Korea”. Energy Reports. 7: 4681–4696. Bibcode:2021EnRep…7.4681P. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.006.
^ Warak, Pankaj; Goswami, Prerna (25 September 2020). “Overview of Generation of Electricity using Tidal Energy”. 2020 IEEE First International Conference on Smart Technologies for Power, Energy and Control (STPEC). IEEE. p. 3. doi:10.1109/STPEC49749.2020.9297690. ISBN 978-1-7281-8873-7.
^ “Major infrared breakthrough could lead to solar power at night”. 17 May 2022. Retrieved 21 May 2022.
^ Byrnes, Steven; Blanchard, Romain; Capasso, Federico (2014). “Harvesting renewable energy from Earth’s mid-infrared emissions”. PNAS. 111 (11): 3927–3932. Bibcode:2014PNAS..111.3927B. doi:10.1073/pnas.1402036111. PMC 3964088. PMID 24591604.
^ “In bloom: growing algae for biofuel”. 9 October 2008. Retrieved 31 December 2021.
^ Rodgers, Erica; Gertsen, Ellen; Sotudeh, Jordan; Mullins, Carie; Hernandez, Amanda; Le, Hanh Nguyen; Smith, Phil; Joseph, Nikoli (11 January 2024). Space-Based Solar Power (PDF). Office of Technology, Policy and Strategy. Washington, DC: NASA.
^ “Water vapor in the atmosphere may be prime renewable energy source”. techxplore.com. Archived from the original on 9 June 2020. Retrieved 9 June 2020.
^ “Pyroprocessing Technologies: Recycling Used Nuclear Fuel For A Sustainable Energy Future” (PDF). Argonne National Laboratory. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 February 2013.
^ Cohen, Bernard L. “Breeder reactors: A renewable energy source” (PDF). Argonne National Laboratory. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 January 2013. Retrieved 25 December 2012.
^ Weinberg, A. M., and R. P. Hammond (1970). “Limits to the use of energy,” Am. Sci. 58, 412.
^ “There’s Atomic Energy in Granite”. 8 February 2013.
^ Collings AF and Critchley C (eds). Artificial Photosynthesis – From Basic Biology to Industrial Application (Wiley-VCH Weinheim 2005) p ix.
^ Faunce, Thomas A.; Lubitz, Wolfgang; Rutherford, A. W. (Bill); MacFarlane, Douglas; Moore, Gary F.; Yang, Peidong; Nocera, Daniel G.; Moore, Tom A.; Gregory, Duncan H.; Fukuzumi, Shunichi; Yoon, Kyung Byung; Armstrong, Fraser A.; Wasielewski, Michael R.; Styring, Stenbjorn (2013). “Energy and environment policy case for a global project on artificial photosynthesis”. Energy & Environmental Science. 6 (3). RSC Publishing: 695. doi:10.1039/C3EE00063J.
^ jobs (23 May 2012). “‘Artificial leaf’ faces economic hurdle: Nature News & Comment”. Nature News. Nature.com. doi:10.1038/nature.2012.10703. S2CID 211729746. Archived from the original on 1 December 2012. Retrieved 7 November 2012.
^ “Renewable Energy Market Update – May 2022 – Analysis”. IEA. 11 May 2022. p. 5. Retrieved 27 June 2022.
^ Gunter, Linda Pentz (5 February 2017). “Trump Is Foolish to Ignore the Flourishing Renewable Energy Sector”. Truthout. Archived from the original on 6 February 2017. Retrieved 6 February 2017.
^ Jaeger, Joel; Walls, Ginette; Clarke, Ella; Altamirano, Juan-Carlos; Harsono, Arya; Mountford, Helen; Burrow, Sharan; Smith, Samantha; Tate, Alison (18 October 2021). The Green Jobs Advantage: How Climate-friendly Investments Are Better Job Creators (Report).
^ “Renewable Energy Employment by Country”. /Statistics/View-Data-by-Topic/Benefits/Renewable-Energy-Employment-by-Country. Retrieved 29 April 2022.
^ Vakulchuk, Roman; Overland, Indra (1 April 2024). “The failure to decarbonize the global energy education system: Carbon lock-in and stranded skill sets”. Energy Research & Social Science. 110: 103446. Bibcode:2024ERSS..11003446V. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103446. hdl:11250/3128127. ISSN 2214-6296.
^ “Renewables – Global Energy Review 2021 – Analysis”. IEA. Archived from the original on 23 November 2021. Retrieved 22 November 2021.
^ REN21 Renewables Global Status Report 2021.
^ “Renewable Energy and Jobs – Annual Review 2020”. irena.org. 29 September 2020. Archived from the original on 6 December 2020. Retrieved 2 December 2020.
^ IEA, International Energy Agency (November 2023). “World Energy Employment 2023” (PDF). www.iea.org. p. 5. Retrieved 23 April 2023.
^ Bogdanov, Dmitrii; Gulagi, Ashish; Fasihi, Mahdi; Breyer, Christian (1 February 2021). “Full energy sector transition towards 100% renewable energy supply: Integrating power, heat, transport and industry sectors including desalination”. Applied Energy. 283: 116273. Bibcode:2021ApEn..28316273B. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116273. ISSN 0306-2619.
^ Teske, Sven, ed. (2019). Achieving the Paris Climate Agreement Goals. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-05843-2. ISBN 978-3-030-05842-5. S2CID 198078901.
^ Jacobson, Mark Z.; von Krauland, Anna-Katharina; Coughlin, Stephen J.; Dukas, Emily; Nelson, Alexander J. H.; Palmer, Frances C.; Rasmussen, Kylie R. (2022). “Low-cost solutions to global warming, air pollution, and energy insecurity for 145 countries”. Energy & Environmental Science. 15 (8): 3343–3359. doi:10.1039/D2EE00722C. ISSN 1754-5692. S2CID 250126767.
^ “Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change”. IPCC Sixth Assessment Report. Retrieved 6 April 2022.
^ “Renewables 2022 Global Status Report”. www.ren21.net. Retrieved 20 June 2022.
^ Mishra, Twesh. “India to develop and build first indigenous Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vessel”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 9 May 2022.
^ Trakimavicius, Lukas (December 2023). “Mission Net-Zero: Charting the Path for E-fuels in the Military”. NATO Energy Security Centre of Excellence.
^ “IEA SHC || Solar Heat Worldwide”. www.iea-shc.org. Retrieved 24 June 2022.
^ “Geothermal Heat Pumps – Department of Energy”. energy.gov. Archived from the original on 16 January 2016. Retrieved 14 January 2016.
^ “Fast Growth for Copper-Based Geothermal Heating & Cooling”. Archived from the original on 26 April 2019. Retrieved 26 April 2019.
^ “Renewables 2021 Global Status Report”. www.ren21.net. Retrieved 25 April 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Global power sector saved fuel costs of USD 520 billion last year thanks to renewables, says new IRENA report”. IRENA.org. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). 29 August 2023. Archived from the original on 29 August 2023.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IRENA RE Capacity 2020
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c IRENA RE Statistics 2020 PROD(GWh)/(CAP(GW)*8760h)
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IRENA RE Costs 2020, p. 13
^ IRENA RE Costs 2020, p. 14
^ “Energy Transition Investment Hit $500 Billion in 2020 – For First Time”. BloombergNEF. (Bloomberg New Energy Finance). 19 January 2021. Archived from the original on 19 January 2021.
^ Catsaros, Oktavia (26 January 2023). “Global Low-Carbon Energy Technology Investment Surges Past $1 Trillion for the First Time”. Bloomberg NEF (New Energy Finance). p. Figure 1. Archived from the original on 22 May 2023. Defying supply chain disruptions and macroeconomic headwinds, 2022 energy transition investment jumped 31% to draw level with fossil fuels
^ “Global Clean Energy Investment Jumps 17%, Hits $1.8 Trillion in 2023, According to BloombergNEF Report”. BNEF.com. Bloomberg NEF. 30 January 2024. Archived from the original on 28 June 2024. Start years differ by sector but all sectors are present from 2020 onwards.
^ “World Energy Investment 2023 / Overview and key findings”. International Energy Agency (IEA). 25 May 2023. Archived from the original on 31 May 2023. Global energy investment in clean energy and in fossil fuels, 2015-2023 (chart) — From pages 8 and 12 of World Energy Investment 2023 (archive).
^ Data: BP Statistical Review of World Energy, and Ember Climate (3 November 2021). “Electricity consumption from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables, 2020”. OurWorldInData.org. Our World in Data consolidated data from BP and Ember. Archived from the original on 3 November 2021.
^ Chrobak, Ula (28 January 2021). “Solar power got cheap. So why aren’t we using it more?”. Popular Science. Infographics by Sara Chodosh. Archived from the original on 29 January 2021. Chodosh’s graphic is derived from data in “Lazard’s Levelized Cost of Energy Version 14.0” (PDF). Lazard.com. Lazard. 19 October 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 January 2021.
^ “Lazard LCOE Levelized Cost Of Energy+” (PDF). Lazard. June 2024. p. 16. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 August 2024.
^ “Renewable Power Costs in 2022”. IRENA.org. International Renewable Energy Agency. August 2023. Archived from the original on 29 August 2023.
^ “Majority of New Renewables Undercut Cheapest Fossil Fuel on Cost”. IRENA.org. International Renewable Energy Agency. 22 June 2021. Archived from the original on 22 June 2021. ● Infographic (with numerical data) and archive thereof
^ Renewable Energy Generation Costs in 2022 (PDF). International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). 2023. p. 57. ISBN 978-92-9260-544-5. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 August 2023. Fig. 1.11
^ “Why did renewables become so cheap so fast?”. Our World in Data. Retrieved 4 June 2022.
^ Heidari, Negin; Pearce, Joshua M. (2016). “A Review of Greenhouse Gas Emission Liabilities as the Value of Renewable Energy for Mitigating Lawsuits for Climate Change Related Damages”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 55C: 899–908. Bibcode:2016RSERv..55..899H. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.025. S2CID 111165822. Archived from the original on 28 July 2020. Retrieved 26 February 2016.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2020”. Capacity4dev / European Commission. Frankfurt School-UNEP Collaborating Centre for Climate & Sustainable Energy Finance; BloombergNEF. 2020. Archived from the original on 11 May 2021. Retrieved 16 February 2021.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max; Rosado, Pablo (27 October 2022). “Energy”. Our World in Data.
^ Bond, Kingsmill; Butler-Sloss, Sam; Lovins, Amory; Speelman, Laurens; Topping, Nigel (13 June 2023). “Report / 2023 / X-Change: Electricity / On track for disruption”. Rocky Mountain Institute. Archived from the original on 13 July 2023.
^ “Record clean energy spending is set to help global energy investment grow by 8% in 2022 – News”. IEA. 22 June 2022. Retrieved 27 June 2022.
^ “China’s New Plan for Renewable Energy Development Focuses on Consumption”. www.fitchratings.com. Retrieved 27 June 2022.
^ Claeys, Bram; Rosenow, Jan; Anderson, Megan (27 June 2022). “Is REPowerEU the right energy policy recipe to move away from Russian gas?”. www.euractiv.com. Retrieved 27 June 2022.
^ Gan, Kai Ernn; Taikan, Oki; Gan, Thian Y; Weis, Tim; Yamazaki, D.; Schüttrumpf, Holger (4 July 2023). “Enhancing Renewable Energy Systems, Contributing to Sustainable Development Goals of United Nation and Building Resilience against Climate Change Impacts”. Energy Technology. 11 (11). doi:10.1002/ente.202300275. ISSN 2194-4288. S2CID 259654837.
^ “DNV GL’s Energy Transition Outlook 2018”. eto.dnvgl.com. Archived from the original on 23 November 2021. Retrieved 16 October 2018.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Top 5 renewable energy projects in the Middle East”. 17 February 2023.
^ “Corporate Renewable Energy Buyers Principles” (PDF). WWF and World Resources Institute. July 2014. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 July 2021. Retrieved 12 July 2021.
^ This article incorporates text published under the British Open Government Licence: Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, Aggregated energy balances showing proportion of renewables in supply and demand, published 24 September 2020, accessed 12 July 2021
^ “Developing Countries Lack Means To Acquire More Efficient Technologies”. ScienceDaily. Retrieved 29 November 2020.
^ Frankfurt School-UNEP Centre/BNEF. Global trends in renewable energy investment 2020, p. 42.
^ “Changes in primary energy demand by fuel and region in the Stated Policies Scenario, 2019-2030 – Charts – Data & Statistics”. IEA. Retrieved 29 November 2020.
^ Energy for Development: The Potential Role of Renewable Energy in Meeting the Millennium Development Goals pp. 7-9.
^ Kabintie, Winnie (5 September 2023). “Africa Climate Summit – opportunities for harnessing renewable energy”. The Kenya Forum. Retrieved 5 September 2023.
^ “Ethiopia’s GERD dam: A potential boon for all, experts say – DW – 04/08/2023”. dw.com. Retrieved 5 September 2023.
^ Wanjala, Peter (22 April 2022). “Noor Ouarzazate Solar Complex in Morocco, World’s Largest Concentrated Solar Power Plant”. Constructionreview. Retrieved 5 September 2023.
^ “Share of electricity production from renewables”. Our World in Data. Retrieved 20 June 2024.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2021). “What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 15 January 2024. Data sources: Markandya & Wilkinson (2007); UNSCEAR (2008; 2018); Sovacool et al. (2016); IPCC AR5 (2014); Pehl et al. (2017); Ember Energy (2021).
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Policies”. www.iea.org. Archived from the original on 8 April 2019. Retrieved 8 April 2019.
^ “IRENA – International Renewable Energy Agency” (PDF). www.irena.org. 2 August 2023. Archived from the original on 26 December 2010.
^ “IRENA Membership”. /irenamembership. Archived from the original on 6 April 2019. Retrieved 8 April 2019.
^ Leone, Steve (25 August 2011). “U.N. Secretary-General: Renewables Can End Energy Poverty”. Renewable Energy World. Archived from the original on 28 September 2013. Retrieved 27 August 2011.

The post Off Site Renewable Energy: 25%, 50%, 75% appeared first on demingworld.in.